This is the utmost grifting and arrogance. Here is a classic textbook example of the violation of that emoluments clause. The president reversed that last move late last night after a week that defied convention, dismayed his allies in congress, deepened his political trouble and raised new questions about abuse of power at home and americas credibility abroad. Our guests this week, trumps secretary of state mike pompeo, the top democrat on the Foreign Relations committee, bob menendez. Plus insight and analysis from our powerhouse roundtable with Chris Christie and rahm emanuel. Well break down the politics, smoke out the spin. The facts that matter this week. Announcer from abc news, its this week. Here now, chief anchor, george stephanopoulos. Good morning and welcome to this week. We come onto the air after a rare last night retreat from trump, bowing to fierce criticism and the prospect of a new front in the fight over impeachment. Trump fired off a tweet shortly before 10 00 p. M. Announcing that next years g7 summit would not be held at his miami hotel after all. The original announcement made thursday at that stunning press conference where acting chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, admitted what the president had been denying for weeks, that military aid in ukraine was conditioned on that country pursuing a political investigation for President Trump. But to be clear, what you just described is a quid pro quo. It is funding will not flow unless the investigation into the democratic server happens as well. We do that all the time with Foreign Policy. And i have news for everybody. Get over it. All this as turkey continues to pound the Kurdish People who fought side by side with america against isis. Attacks enabled President Trumps precipitous decision to pull americas forces out of syria. That move has drawn harsh condemnation from even the president s closest allies in congress, the senators hell need to defend him if and when an impeachment trial comes. In dallas thursday night trump dismissed those concerns. It was unconventional what i did. I said theyre going to have to fight a little while. Sometimes you have to let them fight a little while, like two kids in a lot. You got to let them fight and then you pull them apart. A pause in the fighting negotiated by Vice President mike pence and secretary of state pompeo, its in a tenous state this morning. Our Foreign CorrespondentJames Longman spoke to a kurdish commander who contradicted trumps claim that the kurd are happy with trumps decision. Translator i would like to tell mr. Trump the kurds are not happy. For us the american troop the back of the Kurdish People. The agreement will not stop the genocide of the Kurdish People. I would like to say to mr. Trump, you must solve this with turkey. And we are joined now by the secretary of state, mike pompeo. Thank you for joining us this morning, secretary pompeo. Let me begin with what we just heard from that kurdish commander who says the kurds are not happy, that this is a betrayal that she fears will lead to genocide. George, we need to go back to where this all began for the trump administration. It began with a situation in syria where the previous president had drawn a red line and failed to enforce it. It began with 4 Million People internally displaced or even as many as 6 Million People, half a Million People killed. This administration came in when isis was on the rise. You remember, george, there people were in cages with their heads being cut off. This administration worked seriously alongside the sdf forces and our allies as well to build a Coalition Force and take down that caliphate. Now the president believes weve accomplished a significant part of our mission and he wants our folks to come home and were beginning to work on that. This week the Vice President and i traveled to ankara after turkey made its decision against the president s desire to make an incursion into syria and we put out a joint statement which we think will really save lives. Its worked so far. Theres much work to be done to continue to implement it but were optimistic. I got a report within the last halfhour from my Senior Leaders who indicate that theres relatively little fighting. Little spar sporadic small arms fire, a mortar or two. We got wounded in a town last night and were hoping that the forces will move out of those towns and this ceasefire that the turkish leaders agreed to the question will be how far they have to remove but as you know, the feelings of betrayal stated by the kurdish commander ghe echoed by many of the president s allies in congress. We saw Mitch Mcconnell, the republican leader, saying withdrawing from syria is a grave mistake. He calls it a strategic nightmare. Lindsey graham has raised coerns as well, as was senator marco rubio on the senate floor. Listen. We got these 2,000 troops working with the kurds to keep isis from reemerging and to provide leverage in a future syrian settlement to restrain assads power to safeguards kurdish interests, our Partners Interest and eliminate iranian influence. Every sichkle one of those stated interests that was our policy less than two weeks ago has been wiped out. Senator rubio was your first choice for president back in 2015. You cited the success you felt against isis over the last couple of years. The concern is that theres going to be backtracking on that now that weve abandoned the allies we were fighting with against isis. George, i listened closely to what senator rubio said. Each of the interests that he identified, this administration is still fully committed to. I can assure you that the effort to push back against iran are real and continuous, unlike what the last administration did that picked iran as its Strategic Security partner in the middle east. Weve taken an incredibly different approach to that. The Islamic Republic of iran is feeling it and security, stability in the middle east is increased because of the work weve done. The counter isis campaign, im proud of the work that our team has done under President Trumps leadership. Not only in countering isis in syria you know, george, syrias been a mess for an awful long time. Weve been serious about it, thoughtful and strategic and we will continue to make sure that we take the primary effort which is to make sure we keep the American People safe from the threats from radical islamic terrorism wherever we find it. Didnt the president put those gains at risk by pulling the troops out . We saw the fighting immediately. Im very confident that this administrations efforts to crush isis will continue. And Lindsey Graham raises the other concern as the kurds are withdrawing from that border with turkey, that it would lead to a military occupation that displaces hundreds of thousands. He says thats not a safe zone. Its ethnic cleansing. Can you assure the Kurdish People and the president s allies in congress that you will not be party to ethnic cleansing . George, we were very clear and the Vice President could not have been more clear when we were speaking with president erdogan. Go take a look at the statement that was released jointly. No fewer than three of the paragraphs were aimed squarely at ensuring that in this space, this turkish controlled space, that there wouldnt be attacks on minorities, that this was about getting a ceasefire, a secure area, and that this, in fact, will save lives in that very space. That was our mission set. We accomplished it and now we made to make sure that the commitments were honored. The turks said they got everything that they wanted. Yeah, i was there. It sure didnt feel that way when we were negotiating. It was a hard fought negotiation. It began even before the Vice President and i arrived in ankara. It lasted hours while we were there. We achieved the outcome that President Trump sent us to achieve. Let me move on now to the situation in ukraine and that press conference by Mick Mulvaney, the acting chief of staff, on thursday where he said the decision to withhold the military, that it was in part conditioned on the ukraine pursuing a political investigation for President Trump. Heres what he said. Did he also mention to me in the past the corruption that related to the dnc server, absolutely, no question about that, but thats it. Thats why we held up the money. So the demand for an investigation into the democrats was part of the reason that he it was not to withhold funding to the ukraine. The look back to what happened in 2016 was part of the things that he was worried about in corruption with that nation. Withholding the funding . Yeah. Which ultimately then flowed. Pretty startling admission right there, drawing some criticism from democrats certainly but also some republicans in the senate including lisa murkowski, senator lisa murkowski, who said, quote, you dont hold up foreign aid that we had previously prortd for political initiative, period. Is senator murkowski correct . George, i never saw that in the decisionmaking process that i was a part of, the decision surrounding whether there should be department of defense assistance as well as state Department Assistance provided to push back against russia. The conversation was always around what were the strategic implications. Would that money get to the right place or would there be corruption in the ukraine and the money wouldnt flow to the mission that it was intended for. How do we protect that. Is it appropriate for us to provide defensive weapons. George, youll remember, i dont know why barack obama held up that funding. Maybe he had a theory too. I dont know. He never provided it. This administration has done it not once, not twice but now three times. But President Trump the people in ukraine are safer and more secure as a result of that and the russians certainly dont appreciate it. President trump ordered Mick Mulvaney to suspend the aid and you saw mr. Mulvaney right there say that one of the reasons was indeed this idea that the ukrainians had to pursue these political investigations. Ill leave it to the chief of staff to explain what it is he said and what he intended. I can speak clearly to what americas strategic objectives were in providing this defensive weaponry to the people of ukraine. Do you agree then with senator murkowski that it would have been inappropriate to withhold military aid unless this political investigation was pursued . George, im telling you what i was involved with. Im telling you what i saw transpiring and how President Trump was working to make the evaluation about whether it was appropriate to provide this assistance. What im asking is would it be appropriate to condition im not going to get into hypotheticals and secondary things based on what someone else has said. George, you would have never done it had when you were the spokesman. Im not going to do it today. Except its not a hypothetical george, you just said if this happened. That is by definition a hypothetical. The chief of staff said it did. George, you asked me if this happened. Its a hypothetical. Ive told you what i observed, what i saw the process related to this very funding. What we did and how we thought about that was aimed at the Strategic Interests of the United States of america, the right and appropriate way to ensure that there wasnt corruption in ukraine that would divert these resources to an inappropriate place. The evidence in testimony is also establishing that the president s meeting with president zelensky was being conditioned on him pursuing those political investigations. Were you aware of that . Did you approve . George, i havent had a chance to see the evidence that chance to seas being accumulated. I wish that i could. I frankly wish that state Department Lawyers were being permitted in the room to hear testimony from state department officials. This is deeply unfair to the officers that serve under me. Its wrong. I cant comment on what theyre saying because i have not been permitted to either have a lawyer present or to see the recorded transcripts or the translations of what was said. I cant comment on what people may or may not be saying in that room frankly, you cant either. You werent there either, george. Ive read the reports and weve seen the testimony. Youve seen leaked reporting from democrats. Thats right, george. Some of the testimony has been released by the witnesses themselves and of course the state department is not complying with some of the subpoenas for documents as well. And we do know that so much and this is by his own admission that so much of this activity was being carried out by the president s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani. Was he acting with your blessing and supervision . George, ive had one consistent policy as the secretary of state to not talk about internal deliberations inside the administration. Im not going to change that policy this morning. But this was different. This is not a member of the administration. This is the president s personal lawyer who was pursuing this at the president s direction and going around the normal state department procedures. George, private citizens often are part of executing American Foreign policy. You know that. You lived that. You want to talk about sydney bloomenthal for a while, george . Lets go. I can go all day. Mr. Secretary, of course there have been special envoys for president s in the past. Of course there have. All the time, george, all the time. Bill richardson does this kind of work all the time. Lots of good, patriotic americans are working to assist the state department, the department of energy, to get good outcomes for the American People. This is completely appropriate. They generally have formal appointments. They generally go through reviews for conflicts of interest. We now know that Rudy Giuliani, mayor giuliani, the president s personal lawyer, was pursuing business interests in the ukraine at the time he was acting an the president s special envoy. Doesnt that create at least the appearance of a conflict of interest . I missed sydney bloomenthals conflict of interest clearance. You must have seen that. I did not. Was there a review of the conflicts for mayor giuliani . I dont talk about white house deliberations. We do know that he collected a dossier of materials and passed it to you through the white house. What did you do with it . Thats true. I received a set of materials. It was in a sealed envelope. I passed it to the appropriate persons inside the state department for their review. I never reviewed them. You didnt look at them . I did not. Did you know what Rudy Giuliani was doing . George, i dont talk about internal deliberations inside the administration. He said publicly and theres been corroborating testimony from several others, including some of the people you worked with in thate dertment in the Foreign Service, that he pushed hard for the removal of ambassador Marie Yovanovitch from her post as ambassador to ukraine, circulated a series of false, what she called defamatory charges against her. Were you aware of that . George, lets talk about ambassador yovanovitch for just a minute. She was withdrawn from her post a handful of weeks early. She still works at the state department. Shes a Foreign Service officer in good standing. You know this, george, ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president. When a president loses confidence in an ambassador, its not in that ambassador, the state department or americas best interest for them to continue to stay in their post. She testified and put out this testimony that in late april she met with John Sullivan who told her she was being removed even though she did nothing wrong. Thats a quote. Why did you approve the removal of an ambassador who had done nothing wrong . Im not going to get into personal matters inside the state department. Ive not done it and im not going to do it for you here this morning. Shes saying shes being defamed because of this. Shes saying she was told there had been a Pressure Campaign, that deputy secretary sullivan said there had been a Pressure Campaign since the summer of 2018 against her led by the president. Many Foreign Services professionals say that you have a duty to speak up for her, that you have a duty to protect her in that position. George, in good time all the facts surrounding each of these incidents will become clear. Its not appropriate for me to comment on all the things that happen inside a personnel decision. None of our Foreign Service officers would welcome the secretary of state talking about why someone stayed, why someone was removed, why someone was transferred. It wouldnt be appropriate. If we get into it once why wouldnt it be appropriate . I just wont do that, george. But sir, if someone is if false things are being said about one of your professionals, dont you have a duty to stand up and speak out on behalf of that professional . George, no secretary of state has defended its team, its team members, has done things that served them well, that took care of their families, that made sure that they were getting promotions. We have, by the end of this year we have, by the end of this year more Foreign Service officers on duty than at any time, at any time, george, a couple hundred years of the state department, at any time in the state departments history. Weve done great things for these officers. I see these stories about morale being low. I see things precisely the opposite. I see motivated officers. Ive watched them perform in syria this week, ive watched them perform in difficult situations during my year and a half as secretary of state. Im incredibly proud of the work theyve done and i will always defend them when its appropriate. That may be, sir, and your senior adviser, Mike Mckinley, who also testified on capitol hill this week did praise many aspects of your leadership but pointed out that he tried very hard to get a statement of support for the ambassador after the july 25th phone call which you were on with President Trump where he called her bad news. Yet that statement didnt come. So, Mike Mckinley served me well for a year and a half. I chose him. I had people tell me he was a great Foreign Service officer and in fact he served america wonderfully for 37 years. He in fact had the office that was just behind mine, had a door that he could walk in at any time and say whatever he wanted. From the time that ambassador yovanovitch departed ukraine until the time that he came to tell me that he was departing, i never heard him say a single thing about his concerns. So you were asked not once, george, did ambassador mckinley Say Something to me during that entire time period. You were never asked to put out a statement in support of ambassador yovanovitch . George, again, im not going to talk about private conversations that i had with my most trusted advisers. I think its most appropriate that trusted advisers keep these conversations precisely where they are. Imagine if it becomes commonplace that a secretary of state would talk about things that his closest advisers said to him. I think you would agree, george, that that advice would change. People would be reluctant to speak. It wouldnt be appropriate. I dont intend to do that. This is not a commonplace situation as you know. You have drawn criticism from professionals. Bill burns who is the former depthsy secretary of state, served for democratic and republican president s over 30 years wrote an article called the demolition of u. S. Diplomacy. Heres how he described what you allowed with ambassador yovanovtch. Secretary pompeo allowed specious Opposition Research about yovanovitch to circulate around the department and sat on his hands as trump slandered her on the infamous call with president zelensky and warned ominously that shes going to, quote, go through some things. He goes on to say the ghost of roy cohn was smiling somewhere, comparing it to mccarthyism. Your response . Thats crazy. I think bill burns must be auditioning to be Elizabeth Warrens secretary of state. Sir, the question is, did you speak i mean, people have opinions, george. Everyones entitled to theirs. Bill burns is clearly looking for a spot in the next administration. Thats fine. Hes entitled to that view. I have to tell you, ive had a number of Foreign Service officers walk into my office and tell me how much they appreciate the way were handling this process. Finally, sir, one more quote from Mick Mulvaney on thursday where he was describing how he saw the Foreign Service professionals going up to testify on capitol hill this week. Lets listen. Wt youre seein believe, is a group of mostly career bureaucrats who are saying i dont like President Trumps politics so im going to participate in this witch hunt that theyre undertaking on the hill. Is that how you view those who are testifying . No. I have a different view. My view is that each of us has a solemn responsibility to defend the constitution and to speak the truth. I said this the other day, i hope those officers who go to capitol hill will speak truthfully, that theyll speak completely. I only wish that this was a process that merited such a response. This has been unfair in the nth degree. We have officers there to testify about important security related matters without a state Department Lawyer in the room and were not being allowed to know what it says. Were not able to protect the state department. Were not able to protect the United States of america. And adam schiff ought to be embarrassed by the Kangaroo Court hes running. Will you testify if youre called by the committee . Ive said all along ill do everything im required to do by law. Secretary pompeo, thanks for your time this morning. Thank you, george. Up next, the top democrat on the senate Foreign Relations committee responses. Well be right back. The top democrat on the senate Foreign Relations committee responses. Well be right back. vo rising rents and home prices are pushing americans further from the places they work. This is straining the backbone of our communities. To do our part, wells fargo has committed one billion dollars over the next six years to develop Housing Affordability solutions. Putting Affordable Homes within reach, this is our commitment. This is wells fargo. Save it slimeball. Onstrating ive upgraded to mucinex. We still have 12 hours to australia. Mucinex lasts 12 hours, so im good. Now move kim nooooooo only mucinex has a patented tablet that lasts 3x longer, for 12 hours. The one thing you learn pretty quickly, is that theres a lot to learn. Grow with google is here to help you with turning ideas into action. Putting your business on the map, connecting with customers, and getting the skills to use new tools. So, in case youre looking, weve put all the ways we can help in one place. Free training, tools, and Small Business resources are now available at google. Com grow whether your beauty routine is 3or 57,. Make natures bounty hair skin and nails step one. Its the number one brand uniquely formulated for silky hair, glowing skin and healthy nails. Natures bounty, because youre better off healthy. Around here, the only predictable thing about the weather is its unpredictable. So we make the most of it when the sun does shine. Thats why bp is partnering with lightsource, europes largest solar company. And should the weather change, yet again, our natural gas can step in. To keep the power flowing and the lights shining. No matter the forecast. At bp, we see possibilities everywhere. To help the world keep advancing. As a principal i can tell you this. When one student gets left behind, we all get left behind. This is a problem that affects each and every one of us. Together with ibm, we created a whole new kind of school caed ptech. Within six years, students can graduate with a high school diploma, a college degree, and a pathway to a competitive job. You know whats going up today . My poster. Today, there are more than a hundred thousand ptech students around the world. Its a game changer. Ptech students around the world. Breathe freely fast, with vicks sinex. My congestions gone. I can breathe again ahhhh i can breathe again ughh vicks sinex. Breathe on. When you have nausea, heartburn, indigestion, upset stomach, diarrhea. Try new pepto liquicaps for fast relief and ultracoating. Nausea, heartburn, indigestion, upset stomach, diarrhea. Get powerful relief with new pepto bismol liquicaps. Imagine. Megared omega3 power for your whole body. Now with an antioxidant blend for great sleep, refreshed skin and less stress. One softgel. 7 benefits. New total body refresh. Power your day with megared. We are back with the response to secretary pompeo from the top democrat on the senate Foreign Relations committee, bob menendez. Senator, welcome. You just heard the secretary of state. He said that our goals in the middle east are still being served. We are still countering isis. We are still countering iran. He said since the president s pullout, stability in the middle east has increased. Your response . Well, i think the secretary lives in a parallel alternate universe. What the president did is a betrayal of the kurds who fought and died alongside of us in pursuit of ending the threat of isis. Its a betrayal of our ally, the state of israel, where, in fact, iran now has an easier facility to have its land bridge with sophisticated weapons to try to attack israel. Its a betrayal of our Foreign Policy to the russians who are the big winners of this, and thats part of the problem here. All roads lead to russia with the president and every time that there is an issue or a conflict, it seems that russia ends up winning. And so, i see it totally different. I was at that white house meeting and i have to tell you when the president of the United States said we shouldnt worry about 7,000 miles away and those terrorists there, well, on september 11th they traveled over 7,000 miles and ultimately did the worst attack in our nations history. So theres no guarantees that the administration has, as it relates to the reconfiguration of isis and the 10,000 isis fighters, that the kurds were detaining. Theres no guarantees from iran that they wont build their land bridge and threaten israel. Theres no guarantees about our interest. And in fact, russia not only is going to have a major say about the future of syria, everybody in the region is recalibrating and rethinking about what their alliances should be. The question is what can be done at this point . Senator mcconnell, the republican leader, said that the United States should prepare for the reintroduction of troops. President trump seems not interested in that at all. I know youve been working on a possible resolution condemning the president s action. Any progress there . Do you expect that that will be held up in the senate even though one has passed the house . First of all, you know, the president unleashed this disaster and i think that theres going to be a real threat to the kurds of ethnic cleansing. In terms of congress pushing back, the resolution that i sponsored with senator young in the senate, bipartisan resolution is the same that the house passed 354 to 60 condemning the president s actions and calling upon a change of course. Secondly, i have legislation with senator risch, the chairman of the senate Foreign Relations committee, to do a series of things. A part of it is to sanction turkey, also sanction russia, also ask for a complete isis strategy as to how we finalize defeating isis because the department of defense Inspector General tells us there are still 18,000 isis fighters in syria. If the 10,000 that have been detained by the kurds get released, thats a potential fighting force of hardened fighters with 30,000. To me thats a clear and present danger to the United States and its security and interests. So our legislation would try to have a comprehensive approach and also to seek to provide some humanitarian and other assistance to the kurds, and we need to do this because if we send a global message, george, that, in fact, we will abandon those who have fought alongside with us, then others in the world when we are asking them to fight with us or for us will say why should i do that when youre finished using me were going to die on the battlefield. Lets turn to the issue of ukraine and the impeachment inquiry. You heard secretary pompeo say that he did not see any conditioning of military aid on the pursuit of political investigations despite what hes heard what we heard from Mick Mulvaney. Based on everything youve seen, the testimony youve seen in the Mick Mulvaney, is there enough f evidence for you as a juror to vote to convict if impeachment comes to you . Well george, i wont comment about what and if that moment comes whern the house ultimately adopts articles of impeachment and then of course the senate will act as a jury so im not going to prejudice my views in that regard, but i will say this about the situation in ukraine. The reality is, from my perspective as the senior democrat on the senate Foreign Relations committee, what was done is extraordinary and extraordinarily wrong. The president extorted or is seeking to extort president zelensky of ukraine. He held back over 400 million in foreign assistance that a bipartisan members of the congress voted to give ukraine to fight who . To fight risussia. Once again russia is involved. And the delaying of that was extraordinary. Normally once the Department Notices the office of management and budget that they want to expend the moneys, it takes five days. This took two months to ultimately finally get cleared, and clearly everything that led up to that call with president zelensky by President Trump was all to exert pressure on ukraine. It was the worst of weaponizing u. S. Foreign assistance. Does secretary pompeo have a point about the process . Would it be more legitimate if the house passed a formal resolution on the floor authorizing inquiry and expanded the rights of the state department and the administration witnesses in that inquiry . First of all, there is absolutely no constitutional obligation for the house to do that and so theyll choose the process, but i laughed when i was hearing secretary pompeo in his interview with you because the secretary and the state department have done everything humanly possible to impede, to obstruct and not to provide information. So now his call for being present, all hes ever said is no in the oversight of our committee, in the pursuit of the houses information, all hes ever said is no, obstruct, delay and ultimately not cooperate. So his desire now to cooperate is pretty amazing. Senator menendez, thanks for your time this morning. Thank you. When we come back, nate silver from fivethirtyeight and our roundtable with rahm emanuel and Chris Christie. Back, nate silver from fivethirtyeight and our roundtable with rahm emanuel and Chris Christie. So chevrons finding more homegrown energy, more precisely. Digitizing the way we work with advanced Data Analytics helping us develop more productive wells. And were exploring ways to use Renewable Energy in our operations. Doin more. With less. More data and precision. To help meet growing demand. Thats going to get a lot of likes. Chevron. Innovating to meet the energy demands of today and tomorrow. This is charlie not coughing because he took delsym 12hour. And this is charlie still not coughing while trying his hardest not to wake zeus. Delsym 12hour. Nothing lasts longer for powerful cough relief. Introducing new Vicks Vapopatch easy to wear with soothing vicks vapors for her, for you, for the whole family. New Vicks Vapopatch. Breathe easy. When you look at the world, what do you see . Where others see chaos, we see patterns. Connections. Relatiships. When you use location technology, you can see where things happen, before they happen. With esri location technology, you can see what others cant. Nyquil severe gives you powerful relief for your worst cold and flu symptoms, on sunday night and every night. Nyquil severe. The nightime, sniffling, sneezing, coughing, aching, stuffy head, best sleep with a cold, medicine. Thanks to move free ultra i keep up with this little one. See the world with this guy. And hit the town with these girls. In a clinical study, 4 out of 5 users felt better joint comfort. Take the ultra challenge. Try move free today. Fivethirtyeights nate silver and our roundtable comi up. But when i started seeing things, i didnt know what was happening. So i kept it in. He started believing things that werent true. I knew something was wrong. But i didnt say a word. During the course of their disease around 50 of people with parkinsons may experience hallucinations or delusions. But now, doctors are prescribing nuplazid. The only fda approved medicine. Proven to significantly reduce hallucinations and delusions related to parkinsons. Dont take nuplazid if you are allergic to its ingredients. Nuplazid can increase the risk of death in elderly people with dementiarelated psychosis and is not for treating symptoms unrelated to parkinsons disease. Nuplazid can cause changes in heart rhythm and should not be taken if you have certain abnormal heart rhythms or take other drugs that are known to cause changes in heart rhythm. Tell your doctor about any changes in medicines youre taking. The most common side effects are swelling of the arms and legs and confusion. We spoke up and it made all the difference. Ask your parkinsons specialist about nuplazid. Shhhh. I took mucinex dm for my phlegmy cough. What about robs dry cough . Works on that too. And lasts 12 hours. 12 hours . who studies that long . only mucinex dm relieves wet and dry coughs for 12 hours with 2 medicines in 1 pill. And grew it tony 36 billion dollars. 986 in 2010, i signed the giving pledge to fund good causes. Then i left my business to combat climate change, fix our democracy, and hold President Trump accountable. Last year, we ran the largest youth Voter Mobilization in history helping double turnout and win back the house. Im tom steyer and i approve this message. Lets make change happen ordinary tissues burn when theo blows. So dad bought puffs plus lotion, and rescued his nose. New puffs have more lotion. And soothing softness to relieve. A nose in need, deserves puffs, indeed. To take care of yourself. But natures bounty has innovative ways to help you maintain balance and help keep you active and wellrested. Because hey, tomorrows coming up fast. Natures bounty. Because youre better off healthy. For your worst sore throat pain natures bounty. Try Vicks Vapocool drops. Its not candy, its powerful relief. Ahhhhhh vaporize sore throat pain with Vicks Vapocool drops. No one wanted to question this system, and in 2016 he fundamentally changed politics in america. We, right now, have one of the best democratic president ial primary fields in a generation, and much of that is thanks to the work that Bernie Sanders has done in his entire life. There you see aoc endorsing Bernie Sanders at a massive rally in queens on saturday. Sanders also picked up the endorsement of fellow squad member, congresswoman ilhan omar, after his energetic comeback to the debate stage on tuesday night. But will endorsements like this be decisive in this years primary fight. We asked fivethirtyeights nate silver. In 11 of 16 nonincumbent nominations since 1972, the candidate who led endorsements before iowa wound up winning a nomination 69 of the time. Of course you can probably all think of one recent exception, donald trump. Trump had zero endorsements from members of congress until weeks after iowa and new hampshire. Instead, the endorsement leader was jeb bush. But jeb got 2. 8 of the vote in iowa and trump got elected president of the United States. So, has everything changed in the age of trump . Well maybe. Endorsements used to be a way for the Party Establishment to weigh in, but theres more tension now between the establishment and the party basis, especially for the gop. Also, voters have more information at their fingertips and more ways to participate in the political process, like on social media. That can allow voters to take the process into their own hands, whether the establishment likes what they do or not. Just one more thing. If you look at endorsements this year, they suggest the democratic primary is still wide open. Joe biden leads in endorsements in fivethirtyeights tracking but he has only about 25 of them so far. Second is Kamala Harris and third is cory booker. Warren is just fourth by contrast, and sanders, even with new endorsements this weekend, is stuck in sixth place. So i find that endorsements matter when theres a consensus of them that point clearly in one direction. This year theres not, at least not yet. Its as though democrats are telling their voters youre going to have to decide on this nominee for yourself. Kind of the way it goes. Nate, thanks very much. You can read more of nates 2020 analysis at fivethirtyeight. Com. Our roundtable is up next. 2020 analysis at fivethirtyeight. Com. Our roundtable is up next. Doesnt mean you got to spend a lot because dennys brought back the super slamâ„¢. With eggs, hash browns, bacon, sausage and buttermilk or pumpkin pancakes. All for just 6. 99. The 6. 99 super slamâ„¢ is back see you at dennys you have not specified how youre going to pay for the most expensive plan, medicare for all. Will you raise taxes on the middle class to pay for it . Yes or no . Costs will go up for the wealthy and for big corporations, and for hard working middle class families costs will go down. We heard it tonight, a yes or no question that didnt get a yes or no answer. At least bernie is being honest here and saying how hes going to pay for this and that taxes are going to go up. Im sorry, elizabeth, but you have not said that and i think we owe it to the American People to tell them where were going to send the invoice. Remember that debate was actually this week. It was tuesday night. So much has happened, so much to talk about in our roundtable. Joined by abc news analyst, former governor of new jersey, Chris Christie, former mayor of chicago and obama chief of staff rahm emanuel, Heidi Heitkamp who served as a democratic senator from north dakota, and republican strategist sara fagan, served under george w. Bush. Welcome to you all. Lets talk about the one thing we havent talked about too much on the show so far, that decision by President Trump last night to reverse awarding the g7 to the doral. He clearly wanted it to go to his own hotel, chris, but he felt he had no choice. He had no choice. It shouldnt have been done in the first place. Its a move to get out of it and get that out of the papers and off the news. Theres lots of other things that the president needs to be focused on. I know he loves his properties and he loves having people to his properties, and he loves showing off those properties. I understand all that but this was just an unforced error and im glad they fixed it. They got toe to move on now. Youve served as white house chief of staff, rahm. The question is how this got this far. As a mayor and governor, this would never get through procurement process. You cannot send the airport contract to christie inc for construction. You just cannot do that, full stop. Theres no process and nobody to tell him no. I dont care how much he loves his properties. You cannot do what he just did. I would put this in context, reverse on doral, mulvaney had to reverse, syria policy had to reverse. There is no thinking through of a decision and the consequence and how it rolls out. This is just in less than 48 hours, three decisions had to be turned around or attempted to be turned around. One of the big things he had to factor in is he started to see some criticism on this of republicans, particularly republican senators who he needs more than ever. I think thats right and particularly over the syria issue hes seen criticism from republican senators, but hes heading into a very tumultuous period for his presidency in the runup to his reelection which means he needs friends and he doesnt need to be doing things and doral was an example that put republican members of congress and senators on the defensive. So he needs to be thinking more wholistically about his party and not just about his own individual interests. You served as a senator from a red state, democratic senator from a red state. Do you think democrats overall are getting more comfortable with their decision on impeachment . I think theyre getting more comfortable because the president is making it easier for them to get comfortable. The chief of staff clearly made it a lot easier to be comfortable. You saw republican defections from that press conference. Youre going to see this more and more as more and more information comes out. Youre going to see more and more come and i dont think its just going to be democrats. I think its going to be republicans who are really comfortable saying enough is enough. Were done. Chris, i wonder if you have insight into what actually happened there on thursday. Jon karl was pushing Mick Mulvaney on that. He finally came out with a clear admission that this was at least one of the factors for why the aid was held up. It appeared that he didnt mean to do it. On the other hand, the white house and this is picking on a point heidi just made has to know that more information is coming out and was it perhaps an attempt to get ahead of that information . I doubt it was an attempt to get ahead of information. I think it was a mistake. Where it came from and how the chief of staff decided to do that, i think you saw pretty clearly that the secretary of state was expressing the same type of concerns that i understand white house lawyers were expressing about the press conference. So, i dont think it was some grand plan. Id also say and ive said this to the president as recently as this week. We have to be in friendmaking mode. We have to be exactly what sara said is exactly right. Theres a time to be combative and theres a time to be in friendmaking mode, visavis your own party. And right now when youre facing impeachment which by the way is predetermined as ive said before. House. House. Impeachment, not removal. Impeachment is predetermined. Theyre going to do it and he should be humbled to the fact that thats going to happen and hes not going to be removed and then were going to move to a president ial campaign. The best part of the president s whole week is what you started off with, which is the more people in this country see democrats on the campaign stage, Elizabeth Warren unable to answer questions. Its a binary choice here. Two things, if i was chief of staff, get yourself a lawyer and do it fast. Number two, whats going to happen and theres a cascading effect. Youre right about the house and i think youre probably right about the senate except for this, President Trump said hes going to be remembered for Foreign Policy. Youre having a cascading effect that will affect Republican Voters. You have republicans attacking him now on syria. You got ukraine. Doral, until reverses it, Foreign Policy. That Foreign Policy will start to erode republican numbers. His benchmark now is 40. The moment that number his number goes to 40 or below youre going to see more and more republican senators walk away because the only thing that held democrats for bill clinton was he was at 68 . Theres a number in that senate cloak room. There is a number floating around. It could be 41, 39, but when he dips and hits that number in the poll, watch them run for the hills. The reason i disagree with that is because whats their alternative. Thats the issue. Hes not going to get removed. But its going to have a when republicans attacked him, it has a cascading effect on weak Republican Voters who dont like him. You have to look at where Elizabeth Warren, its not going to matter any wayway. Theres two senators in north dakota who arent going to change their mind and senators down that corridor who are not going to change their mind so its not about a Public Opinion poll. Its about individual states and how popular he remains in a state like nebraska or kansas which has a senate race. Thats right. Remember, all of these folks, many of these folks are on the ballot next november so republicans fortunes will rise and fall with the president and th know that and theyre not going to be in a position to go impeach him in the senate. That would be the worst thing they could do for themselves and ultimately, unfortunately, too many politicians are mostly selfinterest selfinterested. It does seem clear that senator mcconnell no offense. Present company excluded. Theres breaking news. The calculation that he cant shut this down quickly, that in order to protect his senators who are up next year like Corey Gardner in colorado, Susan Collins in maine, that he has to have whats perceived to be a full process. Its very clear to me that Mitch Mcconnell says its going to be a full process. Now, he wants to get it done by the end of the year. This is the great calculation. If democrats really thought this was a slam dunk, they would vote on an inquiry in the house. She clearly congresswoman pelosi, speaker pelosi, is not certain yet how this is going to play out and she is keeping her cards close, and so she is timing this in a way where i think she thinks its going to be most advantageous but shes not certain. I dont know, i think shes lost control of the timing and part of the timing is driven by how many witnesses they have to speak to. We have to remember one thing. The hearings havent even been on tv yet. The last three weeks have not been good. Wait until the hearings and you get somebody to testify and they have to take oath. Look, i agree hes not going to get impeached, removed in the senate but the problem for the republicans is in 98 they overshot the runway on impeachment. Their problem now is if they undershoot the runway because theyre trying to be loyal to trump. And the problem for democrats is this becomes the only issue for democrats rather than the agenda. Theyre not going to undershoot the runway on impeachment. Mcconnell is going to handle it the right way. I dont care how many hearings they have. If it ends with him not being removed, it is a failure for the democrats and pelosis understood this all along. And the longer it goes, the better this is going to be for the president in the end if it doesnt end in remove. I think that this has real risk in michigan. It has real risk in wisconsin, and so youve got to look at this on a state by state basis. Risk for whom . Risk for the president. I mean, weve done polling, right . Taking a look at rural voters, its a third, a third, a third. A third thinks this is nonsense, all out to get the president. A third say hang him from the highest tree and a third say were waiting. So if that third whos waiting, who actually sees things in michigan and wisconsin where we looked at social responses to this, if they cut for impeachment, the president s in trouble. We havent even talked about the other investigations here which are all going to play out in the backdrop of an investigation impeachment investigation. The doj ig has a report thats about to come out and that may not be good news for the former administration. The john durham investigation that ag barr has authorized, again, i think theres this notion in some corners of the media that these are a bunch of crackpot this is a crackpot conspiracy theory. We dont know what thats going to turn up and we dont have the facts around that. Clearly that is widening and so this is all going to be debated. To governor christies point, this is likely not a slam dunk for democrats the way they think it is. Fair point, we dont know what those investigations are going to find and we dont know when theyre going to be released but at the same time theres a third investigation going on right now, the Southern District of new york appears to be putting Rudy Giuliani, the president s lawyer at risk as well. I take all the conventional wisdom. I think its not likely that the president is going to be removed from office by the senate but hes not in control of events right now. Youve got the courts. Youve got the congress. Youve got the news. We dont know whats listen, what i would say to him is, tumble to that. Youre not in control of events, but they are. Theyre not necessarily going to go their way. So dont act like youre in control. Let them go. The democrats want to do this. Youre right, george, Nancy Pelosis lost control of this. The aoc tape you saw there, believe me, every time aoc is on tv saying the stuff she was saying on there, its a great day for the president of the United States. So, you know, if i were the president id say listen, go do other things, talk about what youre doing on opioid addiction and the success that youre seeing there. Talk about other things that are going on in the economy in the administration that are good and let this thing play out on the sidelines. You cant control it anyway. The problem is he has no way of walling it off and saying hey, your chief of staff said theres a quid pro quo. Thats supposed to be walled off. The other thing is you are not you are not going to win this investigation. Thats the point. People have investigation fatigue and theyre picking their corners. The question is, is there going to be enough that comes out of the grand jury that the house is conducting thats going to shock peoples conscience. The best thing the democrats can do also is a walloff, meaning theres an impeachment process and heres what were going to do on the agenda and that would be good for the president ial candidates to be speaking with do you think hes going to pass a trade agreement before the end of the year . You got to do the whole thing. You got to do prescription drugs and price control, the whole agenda on infrastructure and you would force the president s hand because he has to pick between the republicans that dont want to do it and he that does. I agree with you on the face. The challenge is thats not the agenda. Infrastructure and trade isnt the agenda that the Democratic Base wants to talk about. They want to talk about medicare for all, a green new deal. I think the best line of that debate was senator klobuchar who said the American People deserve to know where were going to send the invoice. You had the clip. Were going to see that over and over gen. Is Chris Christie right that that debate helped President Trump . I dont think so because i dont think a lot of people are watching who havent already made up their mind. Lets put that to the side. That is not our defense. There is a bill that nancy is promoting, hr3, which is prescription drugs and that will be the foundation of what shes doing. Shes very strategic about the issues shes advancing and i think very smart about how shes trying to basically continue the work of the house at the same time theyre engaging in this. Democrats on health care, the issue for democrats is about price control and cost control. It is not about only coverage. Its about cost. Right. And we have got to rewire ourselves. Thats not what anybody heard on thursday night. No. The problem is and heres the other thing historically, let alone policywise. The fact is when president obama did the aca, it was to be built upon, not to be pulled out and start all over again. This was a 100year effort. Thats whats insane about this process. Your next step to be early buyin for medicare for early retirees and take on the fact that President Trumps budget has the largest cut in medicare ever by any president. Im so glad hes not on that stage, okay, talking about this because he . You. Im so glad because thats the kind of thing that would appeal to some people in the United States. Instead what we hear is who can spend more, who can get medicare for all, and having people attack other people for not being for medicare for all. Every debate, once a month the president can be guaranteed at least once a month of a win and thats when those people get on that stage. Even on the issue that we have domination on which is health care, were on the wrong part of this discussion and not getting the full value of that actual nomination of that issue. One of the things that you saw on tuesday was, as Vice President biden has had some troubles, been falling in the polls, you really saw mayor pete and Amy Klobuchar trying to get that space. Trying to fill in that space. One thing amy and pete did is say, look, lets stop talking about whos going to pay but about how were buying and whos going to reduce the cost. They did breach that point although they get down in the weeds on whos paying. The one thing i would say is one of the parts of the primaries is picking issues that also help you in the general. This issue is not even out of the primary and its got problems. The 2 tax that earn above 50 million is a winner in the primary and the general. Winner in the general . Definitely. Seen all the polling on it. Independent voters, because the republicans are going to fight it and people are going to say this is about equity and fairness. Shows i live in manhattan. Unpopular. Thats all we have time for today. Thanks for sharing part of your sunday with us. Check out world news tonight. Ill see you tomorrow on gma. Nday with us. Check out world news tonight. Ill see you tomorrow on gma. Up next, Hillary Clinton and her daughter chelsea are in San Francisco today. Where theyll be and what theyll be talking about. Good morning. What a beautiful view, a little bit of haze there, 52 degrees at the golden gate bridge. Ging for a high of 69. What a day across the bay. Were starting our warmup. Ill tell you how warm it will get, next on abc 7 mornings at 9 00. In the human brain, billions of neurons play in harmony. For people with parkinsons, some neurons change their tune, causing uncontrollable tremors. Now, abbott technology can target those exact neurons. Restoring control and harmony, once thought to belost forever. The most personal technology is technology with the power to change your life. Its been reported that theres a cyberattack on business every 39 seconds. Ouch. I dont even want to think about it. Comcast business has a solution. We go beyond fast with a cloudbased Security System that automatically updates, so you always have the latest protection. Phishing. Malware. Risky sites. It can help block all of that. Get fast internet and add comcast business securityedge for just 29. 95 a month