Justices Seem Split Down Party Lines as Chevron Nears Chopping Block

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in two cases that are challenging the so-called Chevron deference doctrine, which says courts should defer to administrative agencies’ interpretation of the statutes delegated to them when there is an ambiguity.

Related Keywords

United States ,David Boundy ,Justice Gorsuch ,Paul Clements ,Gina Raimondo ,Roman Martinez ,Susan Braden ,Elizabeth Prelogar ,Justice Kagan ,Justice Jackson ,Trademark Office ,Potomac Law Group ,Mead Corp ,Us Supreme Court ,Veltrop Harkrider ,Department Of Commerce ,National Marine Fisheries Service ,Chevron ,Swift Co ,High Court ,Natural Resources Defense Council Inc ,Supreme Court ,Relentless Inc ,United Statesa Inc ,Justices Kagan ,Magnuson Stevens Act ,United Statesa ,Resources Defense Council ,Administrative Procedure Act ,Loper Bright ,Trademark Attorneys ,Paperwork Reduction Act ,Regulatory Flexibility Act ,Potomac Law ,Defining Ambiguity ,Justices Gorsuch ,Justices Thomas ,Judge Susan Braden ,General Elizabeth Prelogar ,Chad Landmon ,