Junk science is cited in abortion ban cases. Researchers are fighting the 'fatally flawed' work | Abortion

Researchers are calling for the retraction of misleading anti-abortion studies that could influence judges in critical cases

Related Keywords

Bowling Green State University ,Ohio ,United States ,United Kingdom ,Michigan ,Texas ,New York ,Illinois ,British ,American ,America ,Mary Ziegler ,Catherine Coyle ,Ivan Oransky ,Vincent Rue ,Susanb Anthony ,Roev Wade ,Davidc Reardon ,Samuel Alito ,Priscilla Coleman ,Julia Steinberg ,Julia Littell ,University Of California Davis ,Us National Academies Of Sciences ,United Kingdom National Collaborating Center ,Royal College Of Psychiatrists ,University Of Maryland School Public Health ,Charlotte Lozier Institute ,Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine ,Elliot Institute ,Journal Of Psychiatric Research ,American Psychological Association ,Lozier Institute ,Mental Health ,Florida State University ,Bryn Mawr ,British Medical Journal ,Chelsea Polis ,New York City ,California Davis ,Susanb Anthony Pro Life ,Maryland School ,Public Health ,National Collaborating Center ,Hippocratic Medicine ,British Journal ,Royal College ,Psychiatric Research ,Anxiety Disorders ,Jesse Cougle ,Retraction Watch ,