comparemela.com


Thursday, April 22, 2021
In a recent blog post, I explored the application of the final judgment rule to appeals from preliminary injunction orders in state court.  As I noted, the Law Court has recently applied the “death knell” exception to that rule to hear an interlocutory appeal regarding a preliminary injunction.  In two other recent cases, the Law Court has taken up and considered the “judicial economy” exception to the final judgment rule.  These cases help delineate the scope of that exception.
The first case is 
Cutting v. Down East Orthopedic Associates, P.A.  In that case, a plaintiff brought separate cases in federal court asserting a discrimination claim and a medical malpractice claim against a physician.  The district court granted summary judgment against the plaintiff in the discrimination case, and dismissed the second case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.  The plaintiff then filed a malpractice claim in state court, which the defendant moved to dismiss on claim preclusion grounds.  The Superior Court denied the motion to dismiss and the defendant appealed, arguing that the judicial economy exception to the final judgment rule applied.

Related Keywords

,Roque Island Gardner Homestead Corp ,Law Court ,Forest Ecology Network ,Down East Orthopedic Associates ,East Orthopedic Associates ,Superior Court ,Roque Island Gardner Homestead ,Roque Island ,Fox Island Wind Neighbors ,Environmental Protection ,Use Regulatory Comm N ,Legal ,Government ,Maine ,Uttingv Down East Orthopedic Associates ,சட்டம் நீதிமன்றம் ,காடு சூழலியல் வலைப்பின்னல் ,கீழ் கிழக்கு எலும்பியல் கூட்டாளிகள் ,கிழக்கு எலும்பியல் கூட்டாளிகள் ,உயர்ந்தது நீதிமன்றம் ,ரோக் தீவு ,சுற்றுச்சூழல் ப்ரொடெக்ஶந் ,சட்டப்பூர்வமானது ,மூத்தமகன் ,

© 2025 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.