In Abortion Pill Ruling, the Supreme Court Trades Ambition for Prudence

The court’s order seemed to vindicate a commitment in last year’s decision in Dobbs: to leave further questions about abortion to the political process.

Related Keywords

Texas ,United States ,Amarillo ,Washington ,Michigan ,Elena Kagan ,Barack Obama ,Sonia Sotomayor ,Ketanji Brown Jackson ,Leah Litman ,Brettm Kavanaugh ,Justice Clarence Thomas ,Justice Alito ,Neilm Gorsuch ,Matthewj Kacsmaryk ,Rachel Rebouch ,Davids Cohen ,Amy Coney Barrett ,Thomaso Rice ,Justice Roberts ,Greer Donley ,Drug Administration ,Us Court ,Alliance For Hippocratic Medicine ,Jackson Women Health Organization ,University Of Michigan ,Supreme Court ,University Of Pittsburgh ,Temple University Beasley School Of Law ,Drexel University ,Health Organization ,Chief Justice John ,Justice Samuel ,President Donald ,Justices Sonia Sotomayor ,Chief Justice Roberts ,Justices Neil ,Fifth Circuit ,Professor Cohen ,Temple University Beasley School ,Stanford Law ,Danco Laboratories ,Judge Kacsmaryk ,Judge Thomas ,Washington State ,President Barack ,Judge Rice ,Hippocratic Medicine ,Fox News ,Decisions And Verdicts ,Abortion ,Lawsuits ,Fda ,Samuela Alito Jr ,Ru486 ,Supreme Court Scotus ,Matthew Kacsmaryk ,