Frontiers | Failure to Launch: The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

It has been 25 years since the U.S. Congress passed the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, an amendment to the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, which mandated that the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) test all pesticide chemicals used in food for endocrine disruption. Soon after the law passed, EPA established the Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee (EDSTAC) to provide recommendations to the agency on how its Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) should work. Among them, the committee recommended that EDSP screening should 1) evaluate both human and ecological effects; 2) test for disruption of the estrogen, androgen, and thyroid systems; 3) evaluate pesticide and non-pesticide chemicals; and 4) implement a tiered approach. EPA adopted the recommendations and the EDSP was created in 1998. To date, the EPA has yet to fully implement the law; in other words, it has failed to test all pesticide chemicals for endocrine disruption. Of the small number that have been tested, not a single pesticide chemical has been determined to be an endocrine disruptor, and no regulatory actions have been taken. Here, we review the missed opportunities EPA had to make the EDSP a functional and effective program aimed at protecting human health and the environment. Two reports by the EPA’s Office of Inspector General from 2011 and 2021 provide the framework for our discussion.

Related Keywords

New York ,United States ,Paris ,France General ,France ,Washington ,Princeton ,California ,Environmental Protection Agency ,District Of Columbia ,Alger ,Algeria ,San Francisco ,American ,Louis Guillette ,Sheldon Krimsky ,Theo Colborn ,Endocrine Society Second Scientific Statement On ,Johns Hopkins University ,Human Health Effects Of Dioxins ,Office Of Inspector ,Office Of Chemical Safety ,Cato Institute ,National Research Council ,Washington Post ,Congress Acknowledges The Problem Of Endocrine ,Testing Advisory Committee ,Natural Resources Defense Council ,Penguin Books ,Organisation For Economic ,Us District Court ,Us Environmental Protection Agency ,National Academy Of Science ,A Screening Program ,Office Of The Inspector General ,Shows Very Limited ,Health Perspect ,Office Of The ,Houghton Mifflin ,National Academies ,Research On Thyroid Hormone Action ,Us Food Additive Regulatory Program ,Rachel Carson ,Wingspread Conference ,Hormonal Chaos ,National Academy ,Stolen Future ,Protection Agency ,Hana Soto ,Food Quality Protection Act ,Federal Insecticide ,Rodenticide Act ,Cosmetic Act ,Safe Drinking Water Act ,Screening Program ,Endocrine Disruptor Screening ,Fully Launch ,Inspector General ,Chemical Safety ,Pollution Prevention ,Very Limited ,Endocrine Disruption Comes ,Med Abstract ,Crossref Full Text ,Food Quality Protection Act Implementation ,News Analysis ,Let Science Judge ,Vom Saal ,Developmental Effects ,Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals ,Ensure More Timely ,Quality Protection ,Quality Protection Act ,Endocrine Society ,Second Scientific Statement ,Tiered Screening ,Testing Strategy ,Human Health Effects ,Endocrine System ,Social Origins ,Environmental Endocrine ,Research Council ,Additive Regulatory ,Transplacental Hormonal Carcinogenesis ,Northern District ,International Acceptance ,Updated Test Methods ,Hazard Assessment ,Assessment Number ,Economic Co Operation ,Inspectors General ,Drinking Water ,Safe Drinking Water Act Amendment ,Endocrine Test ,Endocrine Disruptors ,Past Lessons ,Are Oestrogens Involved ,Falling Sperm Counts ,Male Reproductive ,Xenoendocrine Disrupters ,Integrating Basic Research ,Thyroid Hormone Action ,Testing Programs ,Consensus Statement ,Chemically Induced Alterations ,Functional Development ,Princeton Scientific Publishing ,Endocrine Disrupting Chemical ,Validation ,Test Guideline ,Acumulative Effect ,Enoestrogen ,Lifra ,Delaney Clause ,