comparemela.com


R v R [2004] FLR 98).
There is often a departure from equality in farming cases due to the non-matrimonial nature of some farming assets. For example, a farm which has been gifted, inherited and/or in the family for generations, in the expectation that it will be handed down, is an important factor which the court will take into consideration.
Whilst a distinction can be made between matrimonial and non-matrimonial assets, the needs of one or both parties will dictate the sway of a settlement. However, needs are an elastic concept, and if needs can be satisfied without recourse to non-matrimonial farming assets, the yardstick of equality can be stretched and tested. Each case will turn on its facts and the outcome will depend on a wide variety of factors.

Related Keywords

United Kingdom ,Millerv Miller ,Mcfarlanev Mcfarlane ,Miller Mcfarlane ,Justice Wilson ,Pamela White ,Whitev White , ,Senior Associate ,Rexton Farm ,Blagroves Farm ,Financial Provision ,Basic Payment ,Agricultural Policy ,Agricultural Act ,Ministerial Powers ,Environmental Land Management ,Agricultural Surveyor ,ஒன்றுபட்டது கிஂக்டம் ,மில்லர் மக்‌ஃபார்‌ல்யாந் ,நீதி வில்சன் ,பமீலா வெள்ளை ,மூத்தவர் இணை ,நிதி ஏற்பாடு ,அடிப்படை கட்டணம் ,சுற்றுச்சூழல் நில மேலாண்மை ,

© 2024 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.