Of convoy rod. Shepelev appeared already in russia, and while new suspicions of treason were brought against him in our country, he tried to legalize himself in the Russian Federation as a political refugee and ended up in sizo. However, in 2017, the aggressors country refused to extradite him to ukraine. From the answer of the Prosecutor Generals Office of the Russian Federation. According to article 12 of the federal law on refugees, chepelev oleksandr oleksandrovich was granted temporary asylum on the territory of the Russian Federation. According to article 19 of the convention on Legal Assistance and legal relations , it is impossible to satisfy the request for the extradition of Oleksandr Oleksandrovych shepelev. It was possible to detain sheppelev again in 2018 in the territory of the kyiv region. He has been in custody since then. In august 2020 , the dysnian District Court convicted shepelev of escaping. With custody during hospital stay up to seven years of imprisonment with confiscation of property. The kyiv court of appeal also agreed with this verdict. The defense of the accused expeoples deputy filed a cassation appeal against these decisions. And in july of this year, the panel of judges of the first Judicial Chamber of the criminal court of cassation reviewed the verdict. From the resolution of the Supreme Court of july 6, 2023. Consider oleksandr shepelyev. Such that he has fully served his sentence according to the sentence of the desnyan District Court of the city of kyiv dated august 7, 2020. How did it happen . Supreme court judges vyacheslav marynych, Volodymyr Korol and alla makarovets decided to apply to shepelev the savchenko law and count the double term of stay of the odious expeoples deputy in the Pretrial Detention Center to the term of punishment imposed by the odesnyan court. Next, the term of stay in sizo in russia was counted. By law, this rule can only be applied to persons who have been officially extradited. Let us remind you that the Russian Federation did not extradite shepeleva to ukraine. The coauthor of the savchenko law, former peoples deputy mykola palamarchuk, claims that the Supreme Court should not have applied this rule regarding the term on the territory of russia, if the official extradition was not. The law provides. That citizens of ukraine who are in prison on the territory of ukraine, that is, if the imprisonment of this citizen was on the territory of another state, then, of course, according to the law, the court should not count him, moreover, according to the double coefficient, the judges of the Supreme Court counted to the term of shepelevs punishment, as well as the term of his arrest as part of the investigation of other crimes, again manipulating savchenkos law, according to which the term of pretrial detention is included in the term of the prescribed punishment only in within the limits of one criminal proceeding. In addition, the panel reassessed the circumstances of the case and canceled the confiscation of exnardeps property in favor of the state, which, according to the criminal procedure code, the Supreme Court has no authority to do. However, since the judges managed to exchange povnykh two months of arrest, which can be used for the implementation of the savchenko law, for more than nine years of imprisonment, shepelev is already released from the syds, and instead of confiscation of property, on the contrary, he gained the prospect of collecting damages from the state for excessive backlash shepelyev, well, most likely, received this sentence in this form, given the continuation of other criminal cases, i cannot understand the logic of the judges, the savchenko law, which should not have been applied to him in this case, also the question of judges, in another shepelev case about the murderer. Donetsk banker Serhiy Kyrychenko was ordered to commit in 2003 and was revealed only in 2012. The expeoples deputy was sentenced to 15 years in prison in august. Shepelevs defense is also appealing this sentence, and the decision of Supreme Court judges in the escape case opens up considerable prospects for significantly reducing the prison term, since it is believed that it is the Supreme Court that actually sets precedents on which Lower Court Judges are obliged to rely when making their decisions. Decisions of the Supreme Court, they are binding on other courts, lower Appellate Courts of first instance, and these are the requirements of procedural codes. That is , the Supreme Court has both legal and informal, huge, huge influences on how the judicial system basically works, wild absolutely the decisions of the Supreme Court in many cases, this is all an indicator of the huge problems that there are in the Supreme Court, moreover, after , as far as we understood, how difficult and wild the situation is there, we called the judges of the criminal court of cassation to ask why they decided to nullify one of the terms awarded to oleksandr shepelev, it is indisputable that the prosecution noted, and all the participants in the process did not deny, that this person was detained on the territory of the Russian Federation precisely to fulfill the request of ukraine in this criminal proceedings and the prosecutor personally confirmed this, therefore, in order not to violate the rights of individuals, which are then established by the european court, and so that the state does not reimburse funds, we followed the law, however, the decision of the panel of judges states that the mandate of the ukrainian side it concerned the extradition of shebelev. To ukraine, and it did not take place, as we will remind, due to the refusal of the russian side to extradite the suspect, so this is very similar to the manipulation of savchenkos law. Shepelevs case turned out to be quite telling well illustrates how the judicial system works in ukraine, when a person accused of serious criminal offenses can avoid punishment thanks to the skill of the servants of themis, bypassing the norms of laws and a kind of humanism. Now, in the conditions of a fullscale war with russia , a person may be on the loose with alleged treason in favor of the Russian Federation, four contract murders, one attempted murder and embezzlement of state funds. And for today i have everything, it was the judicial control program and i, tetyana shustrova. If you want to report about corrupt judges or illegal decisions, write to me. On facebook or to this email address. See you in exactly a week. The child caught the virus. Mother vera has faith in dekasan. Inhaled dekasan enters the lungs where the virus is. Dikasan works, mother vera is happy. Dekasan inhalation against viruses and bacteria. And dekasan is indicated for angina. Dekasan is an inhalation antiseptic. Sprained your back or joints flamides gel quickly reduces inflammation and cures pain from pain in the back and joints flamides there are discounts on helpex tablets 20 in the pharmacies of podorozhnyk bam taschad have discounts on animit gel 10 in the pharmacies of podorozhnyk bam and ochad there are discounts on septifril tablets darnytsia 10 in the pharmacies of porodoznyk bam and ochad. The roof is a project about the feeling of home, about our roots, about identity. This child was building a house behind us, my greatgreatgrandmothers. What does old ukrainian architecture mean to us today . Good architecture is not necessarily made with the participation of an architect. Churches, mills, houses, mazankas, it depends on us. Will these buildings slowly fade into oblivion . The Wooden Church is a phenomenon, indeed, that is it is still alive in the nationwide village. Will we still preserve our past . There is legislation, why doesnt it work, we have a democracy where people do what they want. Ukrainian culture. About ukrainian folk architecture, its features and ways of salvation in a documentary series from the roof designer. On saturday at 12 15 espresso. There is a war going on, and not only for territories, it is also a war for minds. Russia is throwing millions of petrodollars into transforming ukrainians to malorossiv. Ukraine will become analysis and analysis of information about ukraine of russian propagandists. Specific facts and methods by which enemy propaganda turns people into obedient zombies. For the historical reunion. Lets counter the information attacks of the russians in the chronicles of information war project with olga len. Tuesday, thursdayfriday at 17 10 on espress tv channel. Hello, this is svoboda ranok, an informational project of radio svoboda. Top guests every day, this is the shipping district, kherson. Turn on live. We are somewhere in the vicinity of bakhmut, we are telling the main thing. On weekdays at 9 00. War in ukraine is the main topic for ukrainians. Wins and losses, analysis and forecasts, politics and geopolitics. Serhiy rudenko and the guests of his program will talk about all this. People who have information and shape public opinion. People who defend ukraine and create the future right now. The main thing. Interesting in the verdict program by serhii rudenko, from monday to friday at 20 00, repeat at 12 10, from various borrowers and from those who give grants, they depend and are tied to this program, there is one item in the program , which has not yet been completed, this is the restoration of inspections, this is the restoration of inspections to the martial law, but, in the process of negotiations with the International Monetary fund, we managed to soften this requirement, we are restoring inspections only and exclusively for risky enterprises, namely those enterprises that had a tax burden of 21 th year by 50 percent or more less than the average in the relevant industry, regarding income tax and vat. We do not resume checks on the frontline territories, in the territories of possible hostilities, and we give the opportunity business to work despite the checks. But even if we do not take into account this demand of the International Monetary fund, tell me , please, who has the right today in the country not to pay taxes to the army . Who has the right to evade . Who has the right to remain taxfree, not paying taxes at 50 percent or more than the industry average, please tell me why you play games, please tell me when the enemy is not at the gate, but already on our territory, when he has captured occupied our lands, what right do you have to this populism, what right do you have to these games, on tsiktoks, on these vidos. About everything good and against everything bad, where is this statesmanship position that should unite us all, why not engage in populism, why not play into the hands of the enemy, lets work for victory, thank you, please support this bill on the basis of the whole, thank you , thank you, dear colleagues, please register two for, two against to discuss this law. Of the project of the fraction by my groups, please, please, gerasimov from the procedure, what happened, artur volodymyrovych, give gerasimov, dear ruslan oleksiyovych, i would like to draw your attention once again to the fact that we did not hear almost a single word of the committees decision from the podium, we heard a speech that could have been from the faction, no questions asked, take the floor, pass it on to danylo oleksandrovich, let deviates from the faction with political statements, but we wanted to hear the decision of the committee from the podium, you have already paid attention to this , please ask the heads of the committees or the speakers from the committees once again to give us the opinion of the committee, not an essay on a free topic, thank you, thank you, arthur volodymyrovych, i cannot but agree, so i am addressing to the persons who are speaking on behalf of myself and the committee, two minutes from myself, two minutes from the committee, dear colleagues, lets stick to it, the rules are the same for everyone, you just finished 2 minutes 35 seconds, yours was a very long time, but at the end i heard, i ask for support on the basis of the whole, this is my understanding of the decision of the committee, but i agree with it and i ask the heads of committees and persons who report laws to Pay Attention to this, whether please, i have the floor, i do i understand, please, dear colleagues, let me add a little reality, this draft law is a requirement of the imf, whether you like it or not, but the financing of the country depends on this draft bill, for understanding, we can currently have a maximum of 6 billion according to the imf, and for that , in order to make the budget in the parameters that it is now, we need 89. And there is no other option than not to implement this program, it simply does not exist, as much as we like, do not like this bill, after during one of the meetings, the Deputy Office of the president , mr. Churman threw out this norm without thinking, the imf imposed quite strict requirements on us, and i thank the committee of the ministry of finance for the fact that during the long negotiations we made a compromise text. Dear colleagues, i really like it when business is defended in this room, and we really should do it, but please tell me, have you seen at least one statement by at least one Business Association against this particular version of the bill, and do you know why you didnt saw, because before that we in the committee spent many hours working on this edition with them, and business agree that it is necessary to check tobacco, alcohol, and slide, finances. Services and even a business that has a turnover of more than 10 million and pays half as much as all others, and this is exactly what is written in the draft of the bill, where. Colleagues, voting for the return of routine, background checks is never popular, but believe me , it will be much less popular when we dont get money from the imf, then we have to do sequestration, very tough, i beg you. Do not prove this situation now and support this bill at least in the first reading, thank you. Please, the floor is given to peoples deputy chorny dmytro serhiyovych, as i understand it, he passes it on to danylo oleksandrovich, so please, danylo oleksandrovich. Thank you, dear colleagues, for your wishes for my speech, for your wishes for my speech, actually i also have a wish that we really deal with specifics here, and not. Populism and not politics, i think it will be good for the state , i really put a lot of effort into getting this Editorial Board together with the Verkhovna Rada committee, together with the ministry of finance to agree with business and agree with the International Monetary fund, and this version is indeed a compromise, because i am convinced that there is not a Single Person in the hall who would object to the fact that a state at war could ask a question to an enterprise whose tax burden is 50 or more percent less than the average industry, and why, and why and get an answer, inspection is not necessarily fines, inspection is not necessarily consequences, but inspection is compliance with the legality of the activity of a particular business, and those norms that we introduce into this small bill, they are directed in order to ensure this legality, to ensure order and to ensure access to the army, because you all like, and it may be right, to submit amendments to increase the funding of the army, and you and i take the appropriate decisions in the hall and support them, but we do not we have with you as a country another source than taxes and fees, and we are obliged to provide the law with you. Fair and equal taxation in our country, and not so that some do not pay taxes and others take on an additional burden, please support this the draft law as a whole, we are in a very, very hurry, thank you, please, gerasim artur volodymyrovych, faction of european solidarity. Please yuzhanina, dear colleagues, the military provide with their lives the opportunity for us to work here in the hall and make decisions. And if they do everything for victory, we must definitely do everything for the victory of the economic front, which is very important for the military. And when we are talking now about the need for money, please think about what will happen to ukrainian business, which you are now feeding everyone with the mantra that this is a requirement of the imf, then please, all those who led the vanguard with the imf and could not defend the extension of the moratorium on scheduled documentary checks. Because all the others are already allowed, planned, documentary, please resign, resign to the damn mother, you look at what is being done with business in ukraine, you have nothing to do, go, study, work, you are now feeding us with these in words, please think about how the tax service differs from babe, you cursed babe here, because this is the second tax police, yes, the tax service is for sure the same as beb, maybe she already works according to. Different criteria, maybe she has corrected herself, maybe we dont have illegal blocking of tax invoices, maybe we have a guaranteed vat refund, as it used to be according to the register and without appeal, why are you with lavshutsa now hang on your ears, you lost the negotiations with the imf, i say once again, resign, there is nothing for you to do here, when the country is at war, when we are fed by really small and mediumsized businesses, you are now provoking them to all reregister and leave of ukraine. If in there is no resource for these in this norm, then why is this norm, please tell me, 95 of payers pay their obligations voluntarily, and to say that you will look for something in them to calculate, it is a shame, during the war, you cannot vote for this draft law, nothing justifies the actions that are here. Please, yevtushok, serhii mykolavych, faction of the homeland. Soboliv, serhii vladyslavovich, please, dear colleagues, here i have taken the text of the law that we are invited to vote on, and it looks very beautiful, lets do it inspections for those who work with excise goods, we have allowed these inspections and they are now being carried out. Lets do checks on a whole range of those who work with those categories that are risky. We have allowed these checks, read the laws that you and i have passed, but to these three norms, according to which we have allowed the checks, six more rules are added, including the rule that allows. To resume checks on everyone on whom they were carried out before february 24, 22, well , at least read the laws that you yourself advertise here, we allow it, dont we . We allow checks on dutyfree goods, why allow them, if we have already allowed them by another norm . This is actually introducing a system of what was discussed, as far as i know, three big meetings with big business, big taxpayers, together with the president of ukraine, where they were guaranteed that random inspections ordered either by Law Enforcement or by competitors will stop, how long will it last to continue, that is why our faction will not vote for this bill in this version and we call on the hall to figure out where and what will be held inspections, where they are needed, we have already allowed them, where there are hotels , this will not happen, thank you, thank you, dear colleagues, we have completed the discussion of this bill, i ask the peoples deputies to take their seats, please take them, prepare for the vote. The proposal of the committee on the basis as a whole, so i understand, only on the basis, yes, then i will put the proposal to shorten the terms as the basis, okay, please take your seats, dear colleagues, take your seats, dear colleagues, i will put the motion to accept as the basis , draft law on amendments to of the tax code of ukraine and other laws of ukraine, regarding. Registration number 100 16 rd. Ready to vote . I am asking peoples deputies. Vote, for 237, the decision was made by factions, show me, i put the proposal to reduce the term of preparation and submission of the proposal by half. Danylo oleksandrovych, well, no, i propose to reduce by half the deadline for submitting amendments to prepare for the second reading, i ask the peoples deputies to vote. For 239, the decision was made by factions, please show, thank you, dear colleagues, dear colleagues, the next draft law, yes, the draft law, second reading, 9269, is a draft law on amendments to the law of ukraine on prevention and countermeasures against the legalization of money laundering, the financing of terrorism and the financing of the proliferation of mass weapons against politically significant persons, this is the second reading , dear colleagues, i invite Olga Mykhailivna to the podium, dear colleagues, from the fact that i have written the decision of the conciliation council, 12 amendments of the eu faction, these are gerashchenko, ionova, klipush, censa frieze, pavlenko, seven amendments honcharenko, 23 amendments of the mother, nine amendments of vlasenko, i understand correctly, such a system will be yes. Then lets start, vlasinka is not there, yes, then it wont be, dear colleagues, please, lets go through the amendments , then we will pass, it will be better, the first amendment, mother, insists, does not insist, the second, insists, please, hryhoriy mykolavych, obama, please watch, but i would still like to take the speech, what i promised there for 5 minutes and put nine amendments to the vote, please, please, hryhoriy mykolavych, 5 minutes of speech, and dev yeah amendments, you will say what the voting numbers are on the vote, okay, please, give me 5 minutes to speak, dear colleagues, people s deputies, ukrainian people, i want to draw your attention to very simple things, about what some authors are still trying , the initiators of this draft law, lead or standardize. Run eternity constant monitoring. I would still like to point out that there are no three categories of public persons, they are local, foreign, legal entities. There are no other public figures that can be seen an ordinary citizen, an employee of a financial institution, that this is a public person. The answer is nowhere, only on commercial sites, Pay Attention to. Commercial this law says about very ordinary and simple things that positions are public persons. Finmonitoring works on transactions. The National Bank and commercial banks work by surname, first name, patronymic. How can the bank monitor by position or name, from which sources to determine the public. Persons there is only one source, when a person comes to the bank and says he is there public person or not . But if she says she isnt, theres no liability other than the bank refusing service, period. Is Financial Monitoring carried out in the state, by the National Bank, and special services, yes it is carried out. And it is constantly conducted on cash transactions, there are no surnames, Pay Attention, this bill, it makes changes and makes it from three years to eternal, that is, eternal peps should be, but it returns these peps 30 years from the moment of the independence of the state, does it have this