Vote. For 44, i do not accept the decision, it was skipped because the author made two corrections , he asked to do all of that, he asked for one minute instead of two corrections, dmytro oleksandrovich, did you have any other comments, i apologize, yes, because you have already logged in exercise chornomorov, i wanted to from the procedure, i just asked you this question, you did not answer , but do you know about the decision of the constitutional court, which does not allow voting of the Verkhovna Rada of ukraine, if there are not 226 peoples deputies in the hall, and whether you are able now to ensure that there is such a number and we do not turn the meetings of the Verkhovna Rada into a farce, because here there is a very small number of peoples deputies who stay in the hall and vote, thank you roslan, thank you dmytro oleksandrovich, i will answer you right away, i am very good at the constitution of ukraine, the regulations, these are two things that, according to the constitution, regulate the activity of the Verkhovna Rada of ukraine, that is why i use them to the full extent of the powers that i have, as far as my duty is concerned, for now i once again appeal to the peoples deputies, who else may not be in the hall, take their place of work and accept work in the activities of the Verkhovna Rada. Lets move on, dear colleagues, next, 100. 39 lyonov, dont insist, next, next. 151st mikisha, please, aroslav oleksiyovych, i have 151, 152 and 165, i ask for two minutes and then put 165 to the vote, please, no, for three, two, for three, two, not two, thank you, colleagues, well , actually 1037 is a very bad bill for local selfgovernment, not only that it takes away the actual military the pdf does not provide a normal alternative, because we understand that the 33 billion that will go through subsidies is a completely manual regime that also does not benefit the communities. Second, 64 of pdfs, which are currently in transitional positions and not in the flesh, is also a risk, although the european union. Has already marked itself as a fulfilled obligation, but they imagine the fulfilled obligation as in the flesh the law, the law, the budget code, although it is not there, and the second, amendment 165, just says that the balances will be taken and balances from municipal general funds and a special fund of local selfgovernment, it will be taken away and or it can be used exclusively for. What kind of things, look, we are taking away the military pdf from the communities, completely, there is no money left, and what they can accumulate and use it for their needs and for their needs, and they do it, save on everything they can , in order to effectively transfer it from other programs to what they really need, and they leave it for the next year, in the balance , to redistribute, we now we say that it is not enough that you now have no money from the military pdf, so now you will not be able to use your leftovers from other programs, in addition to what we will tell you, well, this is absurd, we are once again getting into financial decentralization, decentralization in general suffers from this, we will return simply for the 15th year, you understand this, so support the 165 edit, thank you, 151, 152 and 165, thats right, i put 165, thats how it is now. I note, dear colleagues, amendment 165, authored by mykyshiy and colleagues, it was rejected by the committee, please vote. For 31 no decision was made, next, 153 , vasylchenko does not insist, 154 oleksiychuk and colleagues do not insist, 155, and this homeland no longer insists, 156 kiselevsky does not insist, 157 aleksiychuk and colleagues. And they are taken into account, i apologize, they are all taken into account, 164th yuzhannina, please, nina petrivna, dear colleagues, you have just heard that for this government decentralization means absolutely nothing, because if you wanted and saw that the place of local selfgovernment bodies they do not make the right decisions and spend not military pdf for the necessary purposes, then it was necessary. To find a compromise with them and to regulate expenditures and exactly according to the directions where it can be spent in order to achieve a common goal, and this point, 22 8, it means precisely that instead of to work with the local authorities 19 months ago, to find directions for spending, they say, we will take everything from you, and what we will keep, we will only allow you to see exceptional species. Which we have already defined for you, where you saw during decentralization, what you decide for the community all their questions are an absolutely worthless norm, and even if the Committee Rejects amendment 164 for some, please vote. For 19 the decision was not taken 166tik does not insist, but mazurashko 167 , you have already spoken, 168 demchenko does not insist , 169nikludov, please, nikludov 169. Thank you, ruslan oleksiyovych, this is an amendment, it is purely technical in nature, i at all i dont know what was rejected, she clarifies certain points there, she refers. What are the balances, what are there, what, at the end of the year, remain on, funds of special local budgets or local budgets, to direct them there to salaries, employees of budget institutions, Communal Services and so on, there it is all about clarifying that during the period of martial law, it was introduced, given by president ial decree number 6422 of 24. 022. Every word is important, i believe that there is nothing terrible , it does not affect the budget, i want to listen to the speaker on this matter, why it was rejected, it has a shiptechnical nature and she clarifies the position of the committee, if possible, thank you, ruslan aleklivych , the position of the committee the amendment was rejected, the amendment was rejected, dear colleague, because there is already a construction of the law, which was adopted by the committee , voted by the majority, well, i dont know, if even a technical amendment, it is of special importance , the bill itself does not affect, therefore it is rejected, thank you, thank you, the 169th amendment was rejected by the committee, please vote. For 34 decisions were not made, unfortunately. 170 vasylchenko and colleagues do not insist, 171 sha savchuk does not insist, 172 yefimov does not insist, 173 gerashchenko, please, thank you, dear colleagues, so what is this discussion about now in to the Verkhovna Rada of ukraine, as you know, from today the regions , including my native cherkasy region, are receiving hundreds of thousands of internally displaced persons, and it is obvious that the pdfo, those military units that are there at the place of permanent deployment, are also coming to help, for these needs, for the general survival of the regions today, especially when it comes to the affected regions, such as kharkiv region, sumy region, chernihiv region, it is a shame that there are no peoples deputies in this hall now. There are none in these regions, they dont care, and we are trying protect todays decentralization, military units, which should definitely receive drones, equipment, for the taxes they pay. Unfortunately, with this law, they want to transfer all taxes to some boiler where they will be spent with impunity. This is what we oppose and would like, please, to vote for the 173rd amendment of gerashchenko and colleagues of the deviation committee. For 18, no decision was made. The next amendment 174 and ruble, where he insists, 175 kitsak, he does not insist, 176 honcharenko, please insist, this is an amendment that is very important, because it gives money back to local government, and i want to say that what were looking at now is an absolutely disgraceful bill that is going to destroy local government, and we see this scheme, very, you know, brutal and cynical, when this is yesterday we considered the amendments for hours, there were no deputies here, there were no servants, then this morning we got together, quickly voted on the budget, because it was necessary to go on, then we separated again, and then let them consider the amendments, nobody is interested in that, nobody is interested in hearing what local selfgovernment today helps the army. And there are figures for this in every community, and when they say that they are not spending money on paving stones, and who first started spending money on drums, tv shows, it was the Central Government that set an example, and only after that some of the local governments stepped up, instead , to stop it, they decided to rob, 176 honcharenkos amendment, rejected by the committee, please vote. For 18 the decision was not taken 176 amendment rejected 177 honcharenkos amendment please we are considering the law on taking away to rob local councils, take away the pdf from them, and the authorities absolutely blasphemously say well , you see, this is for the military, they cover themselves with the military, well, really, how to return 30k to the military, yes, no, here are the regulations of the supreme. We dont have them, well, where are they , the Regulatory Committee is not working here, but the truth is, how to fulfill an order from the bank to punish honcharenko for what he said about zelenskyis father, then the Regulatory Committee is already sounding here, but lets address it, lets go, lets go, we want to delete honcharenko, hialeras scheme was liked, lets throw out one more peoples deputy, better than all, shut their mouths so that they dont talk about the fact that the government does not find the strength to. Take money from where it saws, does not find the strength to take money from the lifetime scholarship of Oleksandr Semenovych zelskyi, Volodymyr Zelenskyis father, probably the poorest pensioner in ukraine, but finds the strength to throw out an opposition deputy. Oleksiy, im sorry, im listening to you like this, do you have some kind of road trauma about your father, or what, i understand that not all parents are regionalists who gave their children the opportunity to get an education at a Russian University under the government when it was ruled by putin, i understand all that, but it is necessary, there are other parents, you know, parents who do something , including for the state of ukraine, thank you, lets move on, well , of course i will put this amendment, 177th amendment by hancharenko, it was rejected by the committee, please vote. No decision was made for 16. The next amendment. 178 ariev or gerasimov, who will be . Aryev, please, three amendments, 178, 179 and 180, date i have two minutes. Two minutes, please. Ah, mr. Chairman, well, first of all, i would like to appeal to you with a request to comply. Regulations and not to comment on the speeches of peoples deputies of ukraine, and this is clearly written there. Second, in terms of the amendments, we, i was one of those who very actively criticized both the central and local authorities, local communities for wastefulness, including for road construction, which was absolutely not needed at this time, which, for which funds were allocated both from the central budget and from local budgets, but what is happening now is for what it is the same as burning down the house in order to evict the torans from the house, because we are taking funds from those communities that live on these taxes, for example, look, there are communities where, which are formed exclusively, in fact, their budget from military towns, what will happen to them, we thought about it, we didnt think about it, so in this case the most reasonable thing would be to do what is proposed, that is the 178th and 180th amendment, and it is agreed with the association of cities, to define clearly. Those costs , which are needed in wartime, and to spend military funds on these things and nothing else others, because a lot of communities today provide military personnel with drones, transport, things that are not purchased by the ministry of defense, and therefore, if we act differently, we will cause problems, because when. This money goes into the common pot, it there covenants disappear, but when it comes to real matters , they do what is necessary, thank you, the next amendment, but you just didnt say that you insist, we bet, yes, one or all . 1778, thats right, im putting amendment 178 to the vote, this is arevs amendment, rejected by the committee, please vote. By 19 decisions have not been made. The next amendment , yes 181 krulko does not insist, 182 batenko does not insist, 183 mama does not insist, 184 flu, please, ms. Victoria, ruslan vasyliovych, i have several amendments. There are 12 of them, im asking for 5 minutes for 12 amendments, ill clarify, these are the amendments you gave me, 184, 314 , 356, 529, 546, 617, 755, 756, yes, how many are you asking for them, 5 minutes, 5 minutes , please, mrs. Mushroom, dear colleagues, unfortunately, today we have no more than 50 deputies in the hall, although. We are talking about attack on local selfgovernment. We understand how necessary it is today to direct funds to the military, to the army, but we also understand that precisely thanks to local selfgovernment and the people of ukraine, we restrained the onslaught of the first months of russian aggression. Financial times, recently. Wrote that the uniqueness of the Ukrainian Army lies precisely in the fact that it is provided from the central headquarters and from the communities. If there was no opportunity in the communities to help the army, it is not yet clear what state we would be in today, and therefore i suggest not transfer the pdf of the military in full, now to the central headquarters, in that background. And because then you and i will simply lose this opportunity to help on the ground and what will we do when our communities will not be able to provide for the military who are on rotation, when our communities will not be able to provide quality assistance, regarding heating and other Services Provided on the ground, today already many deputies turned to the prime minister, and specifically to the Budget Committee regarding the fact that the debt directly to teplokomungo on places is 36 billion uah, this is the previous debt, the debt that will be this year is practically 17 billion uah, only because a decision was made not to raise tariffs in places, this is the right decision, but it is still necessary, if we gave such advice to the local authorities that they cannot raise tariffs, then it is necessary to ensure that they nevertheless provide assistance, directly to their heatcommunergos, who are currently receiving post, they are called upon by naknaftogaz for the fact that that they do not pay debts, and if they dont get. That money to pay off those debts, how are they supposed to survive at all . And therefore, with my amendments, i propose, first, to leave the military pdf on the ground, but to give the opportunity to local communities to send 70 of the military pdf directly to the military, they can do it, and it seems to me no worse than the Central Government. And secondly, to provide an opportunity for the city authorities to direct their surpluses to help their teplokomungo today. They were able to provide services to citizens, we enter with you in the heating season, yesterday we were not at the committee, we did not hold the committee because there was a meeting of the Verkhovna Rada, we held a meeting with people who were just crying, they say, we do not know how we will pass the heating season, but because maybe at the level of the ministry of energy, they understand when they work with ukrener. With other large companies, but at the level of the heating utility, there, forgive me for the unparliamentary expression, but its a complete ass, people dont know how they will get through this heating season, lets at least give it a chance to use the surpluses so that they can help their teplokomungos, i believe that this law , if we pass it as it is, and especially with the date that is in this bill october 1st or whether it is october 10th after the law is signed , but well just kill local selfgovernment, then lets come to our senses, thank you, mrs. Victoria, the next amendment is 185, igors frieze does not insist, the next 186 repina does not insist, 187 tistik does not insist. 188 dmytro oleksandrovich, these are your amendments, and there will be a mokan, yes, please, vasyl ivanovich, please, 188, thank you, ruslan oleksiiovych, the proposal to give me two minutes and uh, 188, 190, 194 and 195 to be counted as passed, and then to put 194 and 195 to the vote, please. Please ivanovich, come on, colleagues, today we are actually considering a very serious legislative initiative, it is actually a pity that there are several dozen people s deputies in the hall who are essentially interested in the substantive passage of amendments, because according to this legislation, then this year and next year and it is not known how long ours will live local communities, ours will be financed. Military and it really makes a big difference, so thank you to those who show resilience and stay on the job. The amendments are about the fact that we propose to expand the powers of local authorities to provide security and defense forces, because as of today, there are certain restrictions on what they can finance, what not. In our opinion, local authorities interact quite well with those military formations located in their territories, and are able and have the right to voluntarily direct, according to the decision of local councils, resources to support the security and Defense Sector, the first proposal, we also do not forget that during the armed aggression of the russian federation, many territories suffer from shelling and the issue of building shelters for population, the construction of fortifications, the functioning of rehabilitation centers, we do not forget that there are many internally displaced persons in different regions of ukraine, and for their support, their stay there also requires funds and many, many other needs that are related to the problems. Armed aggression of terrorist russia, so we thank you, vasyl ivanovich, we will put 194195, yes, dear colleagues, i put 194 amendment authorship of Dmytro Razumkov and colleagues and vasyl ivanovich mokan, for voting, it was rejected by the committee, please vote. For 23 , the decision was not adopted and the 195th amendment was also authored. Vasyl mokan and colleagues, it was rejected by the committee, please vote for 19, the decision was not made, 179, babenko, that no, no, wait a second. We were on the 188th, and then vasyl ivanovich , to whom you gave the floor, said that he would speak instead of the 188th, 190th, 194th, 195th, everything is correct, and now i say 189th, because we jumped over, i ask, babenko, does not insist with colleagues, does not insist, 190 we just listened, 191sha dmytro oleksandrovich, razumkov, please, ruslan oleksiiovich, give me 191, 1922 there , then we will also get three minutes two minutes, please give me 192 this is mazurasha, i cant give you 192 193 sorry 191 193 there 210 just give me two minutes to speak on them, please, thank you, and dear colleagues, in principle, have already said that these are important amendments that give permission to local communities to allocate funds for defense, in fact, this is still happening today. They do it, they do it in the socalled loophole ways, and there is a corresponding bill of our colleague, colleague from smart policy, mykisha dmytro serhiyevich, who proposed to solve that problem, to really solve the problem you are talking about, so that the resources of local authorities received from the pdf went to the armed forces of ukraine, but your idea is not in this, you just need to take these funds instead of using them effectively, there it is proposed to give the opportunity to direct 70 of such funds to the needs of the Defense Security sector, as it happens under to a large extent in normal communities today, do not spray them, as some functionaries know how to purchase electricity from the occupied territories, for restoration, the lack of restoration in erpin, but other cities, suffered from the enemy after shelling, and according to the papers they did everything there, not trying to steal during the construction of roads, and many other things , as well as pans, as well as constructors, about which we have already talked a lot, and drums for shelters, unfortunately, this is true and you know it, including mykhailovych , and in fact the purpose is not to give money to the military, but the purpose is simply to direct it where it is needed, so i would like to hear your position on this amendment, why you did not support it, why the committee did not support it, and why, and why, its the 93rd amendment, its the 93rd amendment, why didnt you support it and it doesnt help, please, according to the 193rd amendment, yes , thank you, yaroslav oleksivych, dear colleague, your amendment is not supported, because in the opinion of the committee. The issue of providing support to the security and Defense Sector from local budgets is already regulated in the budget code. Local councils can make decisions on the transfer of funds from local budgets to the state budget with further distribution of such funds to the cabinet of ministers of ukraine. Thank you. Thank you. Lets move on, shall we . Please, lets move on. Next amendment, 196. Vasyl ivanovich mokan, will you . 250. Then we skip 197 for now laba does not insist, 198 vasylchenko and colleagues do not insist, 199th alexiychuk and colleagues do not insist, 200th, and this is the homeland, they have already spoken on this issue, 200, 201 oleksiichu, colleagues do not insist, 202 aleksiychuk and colleagues do not insist. 203, kisilevsky does not insist, 204th bonddar, does not insist , 205, bakunets, does not insist, 206, bakunets does not insist, 207, yatsenko does not insist, 208, please, serhii oleksiyovych, does not insist, so does not insist, 209th , there are also petrunyak, zagruyko, razumkov, dmytro oleksandrovich, you will be there, or someone, or