A member of the upper house of parliament and the National Spokesperson for the ruling b j p why does his party seem to show so much tolerance for those who found the flames of communal hatred. Of. Sudan church of 18 welcomes a conflict zone. Lets talk about indias response to the pandemic 1st of all various aspects of your governments response have been massively criticized both inside and outside india a much the 24th your Prime Minister mr modi gave indians just 4 hours notice of a lockdown something that one indian writer called the most punitive and least planned lockdown in the world what did you expect 100000000. 00 Migrant Workers spread out across the country to do with just 4 hours notice. If you want to understand what very status of the situation and this is your wont say please keep up our china theyll be out of it yes nation in the water but under a little to fight a war. With 70 percent of the People Living in rural area its 27 percent its still an ellipse. But people are sent living below poverty line you know or it invariably is every day 25000000 people are genuinely and they thought also every saying that more dying should have been given a lot. If you can see that the fort is number one well the spend the week broke out in the month of january there was only one level. It must have been up when this now we are under so so or at a time before not that much it could be 2nd and dined there were a lot more actual hits because there were a lot more lost for the actual or in the hospitals and the diggle care unit 2nd now. That its 2nd day there will be less number of mentally has. So look i understand i understand mr trevanion but millions of workers were left stranded in city choice with no food shelter money or means of transport did nobody in your government think of that when the announcement was made. It is you have military i would like to say this is the totally wrong. Robert would have been wrong why did all those weary i did it are even for those who i did those who were not having any idle. Second thing died and money is being transferred 1000 rupees to every farmers 500 rupees to every woman and daughter who are living below poverty line they were all white casts not seen once the offer was theirs im talking about the only double edition well i want to see and im just telling you that that the un the un did not buy your comforting assurances u. N. Experts said just 3 weeks ago we were appalled at the disregard shown by the Indian Government towards internal migrant laborers especially those who belong to marginalized minorities and lower caste they said youd failed to address that dire humanitarian situation subjected them to Police Brutality and failed to stop their stickman ties ation as virus carriers. Telling you telling me they dont know what theyre talking about at the end i did nations one g. B. First i would like to complete 1000 people like it but deny her or orsons if poor farmers if 100000000 farmers. What i get. In there is our roots so there was nothing of the sort and imagine the obligation all if one took millions if living in rule it out what would that mean a situation the government in. Your district i would like to see on the International Media there are certain elements in our system which try to give long if only shown to them there are certainly lets talk about some of the bodies within india because some of your leading medical bodies also trashed the governments response didnt they the Indian Public Health association the Indian Association of preventive unsocial medicine the Indian Association of epidemiologists they accused you of incoherent and often rapidly shifting strategies and policies relying on the predictions of model is that they said well way off the mark how do you alter that charge. Not in our hands those who are saying this we are the biggest democracy of the word and we do it a sect i would like to see from eastern europe. We are the only surviving i mean democracy the Prime Minister has to get in and Search Engines of all the opposition. All the chief ministers of the state and then the lockdown will do all this started rival sense of what went to the arms foreign minister savant to be an al damato and the name of one and a stiff and up. Then up we sob and by the opposition government so it was the other Political Parties do it it was realising that it was a wild men walk down like im allowed to have a 2nd 5th of what not so it was taken you closer to each other about what is. Right a sort of incident that explodes brightest as conservative event planners of this answer and which are. And of any justice heart doctor that they hate not to trivia if that was all true why by the 2nd week in june was the Supreme Court ordering the government to transport workers back to their homes within 15 days it also told the police to cancel all that charges against those who went able to get home by themselves its something of a disgrace isnt it that the Supreme Court actually has to order your government to do the decent humane thing that most other governments would do by themselves so who looks after the interests of the poor certainly not the b j p is it the law or not it is a step suck it 100 percent subject Central Government at least go. To the feds object centered only controlling the central units. Stole all these yeah it was a primary responsibility of the spirit governments to look up that sentiment but i do support them many of the sources unfortunately because of some misguided and some mysterious im not accusing some of the governments one and it wont do or all that much as i have action that test created a little bit and in some State Governments of the day that they have the if it wasnt. An 11 or migrant labor camp they sell them give if all i have at christmas and then the subsequent. Men are never coming back people whether by bus it really will be managed and the Central Government has the ear or if i put it above cost of the remit tickets if you are so what it was they said government so if there is any thing to be said arm up while the government has put out the my bill limit is each one of the probably still government because finding out what is the they said government when he doesnt think yes i think that is your heres something that is your responsibility talk to evade it lets lets talk about food by the end of april the Food Corporation of india had 77000000 tons of cereals in stock but instead of giving it to states with very little money or ruling party tried to sell it to them at market rates something which shocked economists rita kara from the Indian Institute of management for instance said the governments unwillingness to relent and give it free to the states is mind boggling i couldnt understand why you were trying to profit from this grain instead of giving people who not you dance of the lead on a moment has given free of cost millions of those who are not having i didnt you got didnt the government has given for your cause like a jeep all. If i could your rice Something Else is an optimal back if they saw that it just died it wouldnt but that is the stuff for dish and cost but not elitist or its just been provided free of cost by government and the State Government also so we do respond by saying well say when you say you dont like janet then that can provide the start just. Not when his is a statistic from the Financial Times which reported that of the the money most of the money that was given in extra funding it was less than 12000000000. 00 or about no point 4 percent of indias g. D. P. G. D. P. Thats one of the lowest levels of relief provided by any asian economy you proud of that on the contrary the government of india has provided only activity when it took 21. 00 that rupee if we just 10 percent of the g. D. P. Just 10 percent of the g. D. P. But that figure isnt filtering through to International Experts thats not filtering through and and also dr trevenna lets look at the special fund called the Prime Minister caspian cast that has also brought a fresh deluge of criticism from around the country the promise to launch this fund with great fanfare in march received some 1270000000. 00 in funds which the government matched why so few details on how this money is being spent and why no official audit from the government know what it has the c. A. G. What have you got to hide here again i would like to see the fund of funds that you get in the month of mobs and the audit is done better than the financial you dont need hussein in the 2 months of the. Other 2 we can barely even tested and you thought probably complete it. 50000 mentally terms i call the quarter hes out of cleveland given my youngest son and it is a new Government Fund even the Prime Minister is the chairman all ministers a member and the 1st minister is a member nobody for many of the other parties nobody from the other party why why arent all the documents related to this fund made public why the lack of transparency better the question of microphone and an issue to get ends and anybody asks that what was left and it was done not show anybody and asked the question and the time dont meet and then its too late and then its too late why dont you release the information now people are giving money what because workers have been asked to give money government workers have been asked to give money why shouldnt they see where this money is going now the government have already given well. It is quite tolerant or if i must have been given to this separate defense has been given which thankfully general of the us and that was when there were. Other expenditures. But why did as you know theres been considerable controversy over the fact that all all the people in charge of this fund are from your party and if its public money tell the public whats going on with it thats the point that people are making to you you know perfectly well its been well reported in the indian press you are misled it is not done by the members of about 5 years or done by the members of the government its not usually thats my point its meant run by members of the government only theres nobody from any of the other parties involved in making the decisions on this on this body nobody and nobody why not get your get me any financial body in the government of india. Image a member of the body of their identity knowing to the touch of 80 its not just your response to the pandemic that attracted criticism agency after agency has highlighted the forming levels of democracy in your country i noticed a few months ago you were highlighting the fact that your country is a democracy this years report from he that Freedom House spoke of the Indian Governments alarming departures from democratic norms under the Prime Ministers b j p it also warded you the largest score decline among the worlds 25 largest democracies in its 2020 Freedom Index are you proud of that can you tell me only one fact on this the most criticize aspect of your decline has been the passage last december of the citizenship law which uses religion as a criterion for deciding which Illegal Migrants can be fast tracked for citizenship the measure favors members of all south asias religions except islam which just happens to be your 2nd largest faith thats hardly a coincidence is it i will give danson to number one in the eyes of the oldest. And. All of the money. And the particulars an awful lot of this knowledge will is very much so it was incumbent on the i purposed to be the secular and the Democratic Caucus that gives shared with those who are religious liberty through we are not selected and welcome yes there are in those states. Bullis why does he stand secular u. N. High commissioner for human rights doesnt agree with you he calls the law fundamentally discriminatory in nature and he should know shouldnt he deals with human rights abuses worldwide when it. Financially discriminatory in nature yes that muslims are well suited in their country then we can consider that it was you have given 500 muslims citizenship but you. Know of id love to but i just come and openly say lets just be muslims also or dont even consider that it why does your party why is it so brazen in attacking its perceived enemies and why does it tolerate so much hate speech we have your home minister ahmed shah referring to migrants as termites to be eradicated in order to protest the b j peace chief minister yogi and that promised revenge against those who protested against the citizenship Amendment Act and said they should be fed bullets not biryani why are these people never reined in by your party or disciplined by your party and allowed to say these these things. Again i would like to say if you go by the reports was that our. Biggest abuse is being used the words of it being used against the Prime Minister and they are saying that there are not. A lot dr words have been frequently used openly and they are National Media all the leading the us openly on this to both know or know. On the contrary you lot a lot of political agenda of the country to public t. V. Would. Be held by police and question or just ask was shown to a political one. And other journalists and busy you know dozens of high up and you put a sinister 100. Journalists who says that you know to be a big help is there why doesnt the Capital Capital mishra for instance of the be j. P. In delhi he led a demonstration calling on people to shoot the protesters why was he allowed to do that law it is wrong you have never used the word through i couldnt find a 2nd fact yes you have the order though you must take us what you wind of or illegally or one month he has used the word i am saying that will be done to you remove this illegal occupation otherwise we lot you thought you are somebody might be legal there are organ for your house and if you 17 years you could not. Remove by police then you decide what is important to what is the shooting to achieve a bit dumb to travail in the aftermath of the february riots in which more than 50 people died and the most of the muslims in the aftermath there was one of the most telling episodes when the Delhi High Court heard petitions about the riots in the city and asked why the police have not filed cases against b j p p politicians who have advocated violence the presiding judge dr marandi da wont the delhi police have serious consequences for not investigating statements by b j p politicians he said im really appalled by the state of affairs of the delhi police the courts had earlier watch videos of 4 be j. P. Leaders capital mishra faca abhay vama and pov ask them which the drop described as hate mongering hate mongering how do you get away from that. I would like to correct i think you were that upon one instance that she didnt say it was what was said by. But she didnt was in the context of a black. But you quote out of your what he said you theres a slogan to the pretense of the country people said to them yes i agree that meant this type of slogans but really we should have a friend and he stopped us but he had not used the word should then he had shot the judge the judge called it hate mongering and you know what happened of course to the judge days later where he receives a transfer or to at midnight to a completely different part of the country and the federal law minister says it was routine and a great by the Supreme Court a routine transfer at midnight do you seriously expect anyone to believe this you you managed to remove a judge who was asking questions about your politicians thats the sum of it isnt it i want to i want to be for you and make a point number one so im slower but i guess if its not done by the government it is done by g. M. Of the force that this 2nd thing how convenient how convenient that it was just after he had asked about could questions let me come because and then suddenly the time for order was done by death row and ive judged in question had also given the consent. Then before it was done but people are not exactly what it is for them to do what he should have been believe much every. I dont im saying it was done rather they have the full affluence in this is a political not going on in the short time that we have left dr to evade it id like to just talk about the recent battle between indian and chinese troops in the northern lot that region once again this has raised questions about different versions coming from the b j p government where exactly did the fight take place between indian and Chinese Forces we know that some of the Chinese Forces died we also know that 20 indian soldiers were killed where exactly did this fight take place specifically on whose side of the border. Prime minister a little bit clear night johnny still but. Not any of what was it under there and. Thats not what i asked i asked where the fight had taken place then our light was no defense in the line of x. So light on military control is there there. And in between that have several kilometers of it which is a lot less so then understanding in that is the pacific defenses. Who can come and what they will not you know. But the bottom line and. Our troops are going to be find out that head of their at elysee in that is ya youre try to find out it everybody so they have decided to force them back so where the battle took place well on whose territory in the no mans land are you saying if it happened on here that chinese in the chinese site in the chinese medically going to alight. This is where the battle took place with your forces yes and the other 4 young forces were in chinese territory or in no mans land where were they. Why is this so difficult why is it so difficult to tie down that you might get in line of bigotry and can be the several kilometers of polish genuine and human that people are fired and i am you do not do any art you will i. P. O. D. And you do not any temporary structure are going to hold up a moment when our troops are truly there follow that in that no mans land ahead of their. Own yet want something to be such that. They didnt know that despite their instructor and then brought him back and they were. So this all happened in the no mans land is that right is that what youre telling me it didnt happen in chinese territory and it didnt happen on indians territory the clear implication from all this fudging is that the chinese did cross into what you regard as indian territory but you wont admit that because you dont want to appear either weak for letting it happen or worse being asleep on the job and not reacting until it was too late which was it no it was very clear that the chinese troops were there the whole the shock and still is essentially there and they were there. The troops of the equally shoving your troops is exactly there as they were before and in that in which there is an agreement that nobody should come thereby to conquer. Why not just say clearly the chinese violated your border or they didnt we had 2 different versions we had the Prime Minister saying no no one has intruded into our territory or taken over any post and we had the foreign minister who said the chinese side sought to erect a structure in go one valley on our side of the line of actual control on our side in other words 2 different versions from 2 leading figures in your government no there was no difference at all as far as the chinese if you saw in the land distance and just saw whats in twos and since. You have actually a certain if you are over it early in 1062 years of your dear to us the out there you know what but now that the fight pollution is then military. Military police so now the outdated america. If you say that the i dont know what theyre going to be just you know what it. Is yes and what the militant group will generate doesnt it is not the end it was that your survey to thank you very much im not sure that youve cleared up the simple question of when it happened but thank you very much for your ounces thank you. Thanks. The below. Is for me. Is free. For help. Beethoven. Is for the. Beethoven is for cars. Is for the beethoven 2020 the 250th anniversary year long deep. Carefully. To. Discover. Subscribe to. Documentary. This is g w news from berlin tonight the 1st arrests have been made in hong kong under a controversial new security law Police Detained hundreds of protesters when state cracking down on public displays of Pro Independence flag under the new law will could face life in prison if convicted also coming up tonight russians a sign off on president Vladimir Putins constitutional reforms and changes could keep him for years to come