Communications blackout imposed my guest this week here in london is jay pound the National Vice president and one of the chief spokesman of the ruling b. J. Feet obviously also the charges of widespread Human Rights Violations in kashmir that are reported to be continuing to this day. She found the welcome to come to thank you a month before your government imposed a lockdown in kashmir the uns chief human rights official issued a report examining the state of human rights in the region between may 20 800. 00 april this year it claimed that in that 12 month period the number of civilian casualties and around 160. 00 with thought to be in the highest in more than a decade and it says 71 of them have been victims. Indias Security Forces the un says you have a poor record of investigating such killings where is the 1st of all i think its wrong to call it a Lockdown People in german kashmir are free to move around the visit other parts of india people from other parts are not yet thousands of arrested. Let me tell you a country to do anything let me come to the detention part 99 percent of the area of Jammu And Kashmir does not have any restraints now regarding the human rights issues there are 42000 people that have been killed in Jammu And Kashmir because of terrorists operating with the support of a country to our west and this doesnt get adequate attention and the people who are shot by Indian Forces by the way Indian Forces have not killed any civilians in the recent past the people who are carrying a k 47 the people who are carrying grenades are terrorists mr pounder 3 years ago 20165 investigations were launched by your government to extra judicial executions but to this day no information has been received why would that be the Indian Government takes very seriously any such allegations and while there may have been mistakes decades ago about 2016 yes but im talking about not just 2016 but if you just deal with this particular incident because 3 years on not only is there no verdict in any of these cases theres no way of knowing if the investigations are still going on or being part indefinitely in a plan i think is going to be part indefinitely 0 information they are going verdicts on other similar allegations and there will be verdicts in these cases as well when are you going to take over the judicial process has a way to go through and you cannot expect. Arbitrary decisions so why the silence why the complete silence about whether the investigation is still ongoing well i mean 0 information silence its hard not to see this is a blatant cover up why the silence by the media about the 42000 people that have been killed that have been killed why the cycle i dont answer for the media. Well i mean you are the people you meet your part of the media and listen im sitting here questioning you and you have an opportunity to talk about im trying to find im trying to your point the point is you must see the larger picture and amps ive said very openly that wherever there are 30 allegations there have been verdicts in other cases and there will be verdicts based on justice the u. N. Report speaks of arbitrary detention socalled cordon and Search Operations that have led to a range of Human Rights Violations and it says that accountability for violations committed by members of the indian Security Forces remains virtually non existant but its their words virtually nonexistent thats a shocking record well 1st of all i disagree with that but this seems to be blindingly oblivious to the larger problem of terrorism that is emanating with support from across the border so i know you would like to widen the discussion out away from indias receipts not away a lot of the problem you know that theres resentment of attention that is given given what do you how the money will be new here is not a problem 42000 people have been killed we have problem were talking about indias response im talking about and you want to you want to widen issue i mention the major block on accountability has been the Armed Forces Special powers that hasnt i can just i just prevented your Security Forces been prosecuted without government permission ok so i think thats a great question allow me to finish my answer the the Armed Forces Special provision act has been removed in the state of puerto it has been removed in the state of meghalaya it has been partially removed in the state of natural provision why because the situation the security situation has improved in general in kashmir we are facing an undeclared war from across the western border and this is not getting adequate attention you need to focus on that serves the politicians who decide and have done for almost 30 years where the cases involving Security Forces in general kashmir can even be heard by the courts is a do as you please lord isnt it if you Armed Forces Get away with everything the world large. Democracy this is not taken by individuals theres a parliament thats elected by an electric of 900000000 people there are checks and balances in place ive just answered that the aft bar has been removed in more than to see our forces special powers that yes i was the un special rapporteur judicial killings christophe high and said in the past retaining such a law as this runs counter to the principles of democracy and human rights not when you have a war like situation and im telling you here that its being removed where the situation is normalizing and you must recognize bitterly were german kashmir yes and. The situation is in transition it will get normalized look i think the wider situation that you dont want to talk about is important for your viewers to understand all of those things that you are responsible for how many times has the Central Government allowed a prosecution of armed forces for alleged human rights abuses in civilian courts over the last 30 years 3 decades how many times as the government allowed a prosecution you know the armed forces have their own Court Martial process and that has that thats there in every democracy not just in india how many times have Armed Forces Personnel been prosecuted for alleged human rights for several times how many come in and i dont have a number. The fact is that according to you i know singleton was not one prosecution of Armed Forces Personnel was granted by sitting indian court in a civilian court so in the world is meant to believe that without exception over 3 decades every Single Member of the Security Forces behaved like angels no i think you are being blindingly oblivious or deliberately trying to obfuscate that the Armed Forces Special provision act is in in force in Jammu And Kashmir and that is because of a war like situation which is why military courts deal with such allegations and you must recognise this is the 3rd time i am pointing out that this is not something that is unilaterally decided by an individual or by an unaccountable government and it has been removed in states where the situation has improved it will in future be removed in Jammu And Kashmir what about the use of metal pellets in german kashmir in this last report the un spoke of alarming numbers of deaths and life changing injuries caused by your Security Forces use of shotguns firing metal pellets children have been among the victims the stone throwers that you have been referring to have in the past used to be many decades ago responded with riot responses involving bullets so that was scaled down to go down to pellets which is far less deadly rather than use guns and among those stone throwers you cant a 19 month old girl who was shot in her right arm no girl in 1000 money being a good target forces you know thats a very unfair thing to say you must also refer to all those videos of Indian Forces behaving with great forbearance against enormous attacks deadly attacks with stones and bottles and these are organized riots these are funded by terrorist organizations recognized by the United Nations you must also shed light on them according to the main hospital in kashmir that treats such injuries circus sri maharajah had the same hospital. 1253 people have been blinded by metal pilots fired by you Security Services just in 2 and a half year period from the 2016 up until the end of last year 1253 people now sightless now steps have been taken to further reduce the kind of measures being taken to control such attacks what does that really for solutions what it means is where is earlier thousands of people used to be at risk because of firing of real bullets it came down to using pellets and today even that is used only in the rarest of rare circumstances Government Data from 2017 showed the weapon killed 13 people and injured more than 6000 in 8 months and the nearly 800 people sustained injuries knowing those risks and those statistics inescapable conclusion is that your forces intended to cause those injuries didnt know our forces intended to maintain peace and law and order and you know you cant keep. Focusing only on specific casualties without looking at the war like situation that we are facing and it is important to recognize that the Current Situation that has developed in kashmir since august is that an article which was the only article called temporary in our constitution has been diluted and this is creating a lot of misguided communications internationally whereas article 370 provided shelter to all kinds of horrible things it did not allow 106 indian laws passed by parliament and the Supreme Court rulings to apply in kashmir including your rights including womens rights including minority going slightly of the subjective. Its amazing to me i took about 12 of the 53 people who sightless and you took over the rights somewhere else in the dont talk about them as if you do not own im not you know given where im right ok but do you not care about these 2 of those really kerry people do you not. Care about the 42000 people that have been killed so why then the apology why then no apologies for these blind it is right you know we dress a little this is regrettable when any such injury takes place but this is actually a scaling down of the kind of violin the real stress in the courts why no apologies there will be there will be when there will be action in the courts no proper compensation for these people of course there will be compensation really d anybody is yes of course there will be lets talk about what happened in august. Whatever the reasons for the indians action increased security threats smuggling etc but he uses of resources it became an excuse for a large number of arrests and detentions that continue to this day on what grounds were some 4000 people deprived of the and the beauty in fact we need to continue to this day there have been releases taking place you know 1000 people its important to understand something that this is an unfinished part of the Indian Independence struggle and partition because when partition happened imposed by the british it happened with a certain set of circumstances and similar restraints were put into place in the punjab introduced done in good rock the point is when these restrictions were put also in places like bengal in a stamp it was because tens of thousands of people were killed in the partition violence now right now these restraints have been put into place because we had a choice of either having temporary restraints or permanent loss of lives you havent told me what these people had done 4000 people in german kashmir after your ogust. Changes if you like in the status of kashmir why 4000 people were detained you havent told me why i dont know that it is 4000 but i will tell you that if the same detentions had happened in 94748 which we believe should have happened then we would have been integrated to india now so you dont you dont know why these people know i do know why these people many of them have gone. On the record questioning the constitution of india questioning the larger question unable they are allowed to question but they are not allowed to take arms they are not allowed to smuggle arms and drugs they are not allowed to indulge in Money Laundering to fund the likes of. And the likes of jasim ahmed which are operating from pakistan and sending in these would have been to kill in india. A month after the operation the Supreme Court had to step in and tell your government to get on with restoring normal life as soon as possible with one of the judges sherrod of and bob calling the situation a terrible state of affairs so in the words of one of your own Supreme Court judges created a terrible state and youre not telling the full story here so the Supreme Court is indeed hearing petitions regarding german kashmir but already restriction had been removed gradually from after the 1st 24 hours what the judge said is that they should continue and the judge did not grant relief to the people who wanted these detentions to be taken away right away because of the security situation so yes indeed this restraint must be removed they are being removed and it is a process a court even had to order the authorities to transfer the sick leader of the communist party to hospital in delhi because nobody was allowed to go in or out of his house not so they had to order a basic humanitarian provision or through that misrepresentation some people trying to misrepresent this because he was allowed to to be shifted to hospital there was a delay because of certain technicalities why is the among those who held why is the former chief minister of iraq now in his foreign capital and now in his eightys being also detained what kind of threat does he represent to the government of india is that with due respect to mr abdullah with whom i have also served in parliament he did go around making very incendiary statements when article 370 was diluted now we have had a situation where people. Have. On the surface pledged allegiance to the Indian Constitution but have straddled the ground which flirts with separatists which flirts with terrorists who are operating from across the border and a lot of these separatists their own children arent they dont have any skin in the game they dont live abroad here in the u. K. And in the us its. Really also rested his daughter and sister who were simply holding up placards in the street no they were released the point is this 99 percent of the area of Jammu And Kashmir today has no restraints and this has gradually been eased over the past 10 or 11 weeks now at a certain point when more areas had certain restraints yes Public Events were prohibited because of the law and order issue. Amnesty internationals reports that the lawyers and family members of the detainees are not informed of the grounds of the arrest no even the whereabouts of that and relatives how can that be right to chrissie when you have a war like situation the law that has been in place there allows for a certain period of detention now talking about the Public Safety act most of the prominent leaders are not kept in jail they are kept in guest houses with security measures. As i keep repeating something we had a choice the indian state had a choice between temporary restraints and permanent loss of lives and you must recognize its only fair to point out that in these last 11 weeks a large number of these restraints have been actually removed at lawyers and family members are not informed of the grounds of the rest nor even the whereabouts of their clients and relatives i come back to that question they will i wish that i was that allowed to look or see that that is allowed by the Public Safety act passed by the former state of Jammu And Kashmir for a certain period its not indefinite its for a limited period but its important to point out that the other restraints that you have referred to for example initially phone lines were not allowed to day not only or landlines but all postpaid cell phone lines are already functional. Well it will afford. So as of yesterday group of you members of parliament are visiting your mood privately for them so thats ok and most members are by limits in delhi have not been the most members of parliament when they travel to other countries and ive personally led many such delegations do indeed travel privately and not as official representatives of their legislatures. Mr pound b. G. P. Doesnt like criticism one of one of your rising political stars just we saw here captured the mood of the party in the recent election when he produced a video proclaimed if you are with modi you are with india and if you are not with modi you are anti india do you buy into that you know the reality is mr modi is extremely popular and i think you would find poll after poll like people surveys have pointed out that nearly 3 fourths of the indian population is with mr modi so hes technically correct 40 percent of the population im sorry 40 percent of the vote in the recent election that because of our reporting system of a parliamentary system which we have inherited from this country if we had a president ial election things might be quite different whether you approve of that slogan i said hes technically correct that the you know the people surveys show that 3 fourths of the people of india are with mr modi so hes right but i want not if i am not willing anti india is that is that you position your anti india if you are not with modi no its possible for a Different Party or l. T. And let me point out its of course possible to be against mr modi and still not be anti india but sadly many people in the opposition have taken a stance or made comments which are being used by terrorist organizations which are being used by the government of pakistan which is indeed anti india so if those people self identify as being both against mr modi and also anti india then thats their own choice its not just pakistan terrorists who are criticizing the position of your government is it your your ruling party is said to have instilled a climate of fear something of which the world renowned and respected indian academic marty has sent highlighted recently an interview he said people were scared of your government ive never seen this before he added when someone says something critical of the government on the phone with me they said. I better talk about it when i see you because im sure theyre listening to this conversation thats not a way to run a democracy he says its also not a way of understanding what the majority wants so or is he actually india and why dont i answer that with due respect to professor mature sen he has an unstinted record of making such statements against the b. G. P. And against Prime Minister more the i think a better alternative to look at would be the latest indian economics Nobel Laureate which is a huge advantage g. E. Who has a balanced track record of both criticising some of the steps taken by our government as well as supporting some of the deep seated reforms that the more the government is embarking on. But there are plenty of examples where youve been squeezing the space for free speech up and you know thats not true really thats not true because we hear this week after week when people claim that their right to free speech is being squeezed and where do we hear this we hear this in Television Debates we hear this in newspaper columns and we hear this online statement we hear this in public protests in india thats what i dont hear what you think Freedom House is the latest report which says that despite a vibrant media indian journalists risk harrison and Death Threats and physical violence in connection with their work such attacks are rarely published some of taken place with the complicity or active participation of police. I think it is shameful whenever any journalist is attacked indeed there have been some attacks and maybe there are people complicit at the lower level but prosecutions do happen to happen and i can you know i can tell you very comprehensively it is not the indian state it is not the Indian Government and it is not the b. G. P. Which condones this what is telling is the latest in your crime report which is more than a year late leaves out some rather important categories like attacks on journalists nothing about Human Rights Violations by Security Forces or attacks by vigilantes when asked about these gaps your Home Affairs Ministry said that data for these categories had been withheld because it was unreliable and prone to mis interpretation thats pretty heavy handed censorship no it isnt censorship let me explain we have had a few cases of despicable vigilantism but somehow one section tries to portray it as if its only about protection its not we have unfortunately had with plenty of people who are suspected child abductors of people who are peeves and when. Mainstream media outlets. Try to portray all of them as only one kind of vigilantism it shows that they have an agenda and that needs to be desegregated so you dont put up the figures in case people might just draw the wrong not just for my thats thats what thats what not just might this censorship allow people to make up their own minds so the commentator under another now and i think you would do well to look into the research that he has put up is that mainstream newspapers have tried to pass off as carville aunties im all kinds of violence that has taken place and they try to portray only one kind of violence they dont portray another kind of violence the actively try to suppress it with an agenda so it i think for yourself 1st needs to know the truth needs to come out it does not serve anyones purpose to miscategorized one kind of violence as another kind responder 6 years ago long before you joined the b j p complain that the criminalize edition of politics in india had become a sad reality you wrote then getting elected has become a convenient shield to delay the legal processes and escape conviction why has your party done nothing about the large number of indicted people sitting in parliament in fact its actually got worse in fact my party has done a lot by the way so what are the factors worst literally were in europe and there arent worse actually let me let me let me explain so this is not a new thing weve had the criminalization of indian politics going back to several decades into the late sixtys and early seventys Prime Minister modi has repeatedly called for fast track courts to expedite the trials of elected officials the right offer and you dont have them no you see the this our judicial system requires you know its not just that government can push through these things so we need to shield reforms and that is something that not just i but many in our party led by the Prime Minister himself are campaigning let me just correct what you said you said the figures were. And worse the association for democratic reform compared the numbers of indicted they were pleased elected to the lower house in the last 2 general elections and the increase has been spectacular 201434 percent of them face declared criminal cases by 2019 has it increased by almost 10 percent to 43 percent the proportion of those facing serious charges has also shot up from 21 to 29 percent so you obviously are not aware of the loads no i am aware i think you are not aware of Something Else several m. P. s have been disqualified from parliament because of getting convicted this was of the result of the campaign that many of us carried on now regarding those who have allegations against them you call them indictments we have our system is a little more complex its taken from the british from many decades ago all of the Election Commission has got tighter and tighter and forcing declarations earlier many of these facts were not being declared so i dont think there has been actually an increase of criminal m. P. s it has in fact been a decrease well thats your supposition but thats not close not what i thought it was not borne out are you not aware as i you are not are you not aware that the Election Commission has in fact imposed more stringent guidelines for declarations of any charges being faced by people contesting elections so it sounds like it should have done jaipur thank you very much for being on conflicts. The. Strong opinions clear position of the International Perspective such. As of this week the meeting in london to mark the 70th anniversary of an organization that wants to see itself as the most successful military alliance in history but how deep are the rifts within iraqs find out on to the point. In 90 minutes on the leader. In the army of climate change. Summit the city. People. Want to use today how far future. D. W. Dot com africa megacity the melting. Cutter. Show hello upswings this is your ball speaking when i come to the show with the ding dong ha concerts with the most stressed guests. W. This is the w. News live from berlin the most powerful woman in washington says the time has come to begin drafting articles of impeachment against president trump. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the president s actions threaten the heart of the constitution and the old micros have no choice but to act democrats charge that trump abused his office 5 pressing you crime to