DOJ's Neutral Stance on Corporate Monitorships

The Revised Policy reiterates DOJ’s neutral presumption with respect to the decision of whether to appoint a monitor. Prosecutors must consider 10 non-exhaustive factors when making this decision. Those factors include whether the company voluntarily self-disclosed the misconduct

Related Keywords

Lisa Monaco ,National Institute On White Collar Crime ,Department Of Justice ,Standing Committee ,Office Of The Deputy Attorney General ,American Bar Association ,Division Matters The Revised ,Corporate Crime Advisory Group ,Justice Department ,Annual National Institute ,White Collar Crime ,Assistant Attorney General ,Revised Memorandum ,Criminal Division Matters ,Determining Whether ,Further Revisions ,Corporate Criminal Enforcement Policies ,Revised Policy ,Deputy Attorney ,Further Revision ,Legal ,Business ,Government ,Doj ,Kenneth Polite ,Cag ,Orporate Mentorship , ,