All visitors have to register via biometrics, such as palm scans, face scans, eye scans, etc., before they are allowed to enter. Once they enter, they are continually monitored via cameras and microphones that monitor one's biometrics while on the premises. Anyone who approaches the premises is picked up by cameras that immediately seek to identify who the person is before allowing entrance. Did I just describe how one visits a friend or relative who is incarcerated in a jail, prison or mental ward, or did I just describe how new "smart homes" operate? Actually, both. And that's the point. The public is voluntarily surrendering their privacy for the sake of "convenience" and "security," while not understanding that what they are trading in for these "conveniences" and illusions of "security" is the ability for government agents to lock them down in their own homes, just as they lock down prisoners in jails, hospitals, mental institutions, and other places of incarceration. And for those of you who believe what I am writing here is an overstated "conspiracy theory," you have very short memories. It was just 3 years ago when most of the world was locked down in their homes all in the name of "COVID." If you think that they would never do something that again, then you are not living in reality. Everything in the media right now, which includes the corporate media, and the alternative media, is almost all a distraction to take your attention away from the imminent roll-out of biometric ID programs. If your bank or employer required you to surrender your biometrics to have access to your money tomorrow, would you comply? Would you allow them to scan your palm, your face, the irises of your eyes, or even provide a DNA sample of your blood, in order to access your money?