fulton, the gay right case, she pen a concurrence, saying she would be open to a case that would consider whether or not the court overruled that precedent, diplomat decision versus smith. she just didn't think it was relevant or necessary to do so in this particular case. i think tipping her hand at that, that she has a more sweeping vision of religious freedom perhaps than what might have been expected from her at the confirmation, that she's willing to go there? the future, but just not right now. >> thank you so much for your analysis here. i know you have other obligations, and i appreciate you being with us. ari melber, same question to you. >> i think the bigheadline is obamacare is one of the most challenging pieces and has been found time and time again to be lawful and constitutional. it's a bit of the paradox in the law where if you challenge it a