but that's what he'll be looking forward. it will be a limited and long inquiry. and not a substitution for a full congressional inquiry. >> katie, you don't need to remind you, trump has been falsely publicly calling adam schiff a leaker, constantly calling for an investigation. how could that be used as evidence now? >> well, it would just be evidence that there was the complete and total politicization of the department of justice during the trump administration. i mean, you know, there's actual supreme court precedent, alicia, concerning federal grand jury subpoenas because that's exactly what was used in this case as the vehicle by which the records were obtained for 73 phone numbers and at least 16 email addresses from apple. this prior supreme court precedent says that these grand jury subpoenas, although they can be readily issued as long as they're generally relevant to an investigation, they can never be used as a fishing expedition,