gop. most notably senator richard burr of north carolina they write, who is the chairman of the senate intelligence committee, who cautioned the president's advisers he considered mr. radcliffe too political for the post, what's your view on what that means, what burr's lack of public comments and that private reporting means and how that the relate to whether ratcliffe gets confirmed here. >> the senate intelligence committee, it's a serious body. members take their obligation to exercise oversight on the intelligence community on behalf of the american people. when senator mark warner of virginia, you can count on them to run serious, thoughtful, deeply intro speculative process to try to understand what his views are on the intelligence community. this won't be rubber stach process. if chairman burr isn't going on