years later for him to stand up and defend that decision is unexplicable. on the same timeline i had a case in my office, i was an appellate chief about making pornography with young victims. the sentence received was not the maximum sentence but it was long enough to keep that defendant in jail functionally for the rest of his life and she was outraged. she wanted to appeal to the judge. she wanted every last minute, every last day she was entitled to of this sentence. that's how strongly prosecutors feel about these cases and about protecting young children. i don't understand acosta's point of view here. >> i want to ask you about the role of money. we talk a lot about mischarge of justice for women. acosta trotted out this ludicrous argument about things were so different, it wasn't 1907. it was 2008. but money seems to be the variable, not a point in time.