version of volume 2, which is the obstruction of justice. for most of the american public, that's the one we want to look at. the underlying evidence in the unredacted portions of the section. we know that mueller stated that but for that office of legal counsel opinion that said you cannot indict a sitting u.s. president. that's the question that should be posed to robert mueller, would you have indicted donald trump regardless of his status? >> is that a question you would ask? >> absolutely. i would want to know, if your hands weren't bound or tied by this office of legal counsel memorandum that said you can't indict a sitting president, would you have pursued an indictment against him? jo ling, the reality is this. there's several people that haven't read the mueller report, some members of congress haven't taken the time to read, perhaps one of the most important