understands there are people in the press and congress elsewhere saying why they wasted their time with that. she didn't answer many questions about her time in the white house. they said we knew this was going to happen. the point was to dramatize for the court what the implications are. he is referencing a lawsuit that he will force don mcgahn to testify. could this be good news for democrats if it makes some case to the court on other white house officials? >> he is right. he's building a record that will be presented to a federal court judge here in washington, d.c. they will see the games that the administration is playing. i skimmed hope hicks' pages of testimony. the good news, i don't think we have to give america that reading assignment. i can sum it up. hope hicks covered up presidential crimes and did so without a viable privilege. 30-second history lesson. judge baits decided this issue