collusion with anybody else in russia who wasn't a government official? also, why even bring that up and why is that the most important thing? i think most important what you saw today -- is that the most important thing? i mean, not only was manafort not charged with anything having to do with russia in this case, in this case for which he was just sentenced, this was the trial where judge ellis actually banned any discussion of russia collusion at all in his courtroom. so nobody could have tried to prove anything like that against manafort in this trial in virginia, even if they had wanted to. and these no collusion arguments from the manafort defense team which we have seen increasingly from them in public filings and now today on the courthouse steps as manafort has come to the end of his rope, these no collusion arguments are absolutely outside the four corners of this case in virginia, so why do they keep bringing that up and why would that be the most important part about this case where the judge ruled that that could never be discussed in this case? why keep going back to that issue?