there. that was just a mistake just a typo, fat finger kind of --. "the washington post" reported at the time that although that language about julian assange was unintentionally disclosed in that unrelated case according to people familiar with the matter that language about julian assange was quote true. oh. well, if so, that was a weird way to learn about it. today's news makes it seem like maybe it was true. today that same assistant u.s. attorney, that same federal prosecutor blamed for making that weird mistake and putting that language about julian assange and that unrelated case today was spotted in court for the sealed hearing. that assistant u.s. attorney was spotted in court alongside the u.s. attorney himself for the eastern district of virginia and then, chelsea manning of all people also appeared at that same courthouse walking out at the end of the day to tell