meant by that. he really wouldn't. he said they did not amount to witness tampering. he wasn't trying to, you know, on instruct justice with them, but, of course, we asked him what he was trying to do, he says everybody has a right to free speech, in effect. >> we commended to everyone's attention who's watching, but do you remember any other moment that you kind of noted to yourself, well, that's new. or that's a change. >> well, a number of things, i think it was interesting to hear him say that rod rosenstein had told him or his lawyers, said it both ways at different points, that he was not target of the investigation. we don't exactly know what that means. that could mean simply that the prosecutor isn't going to indict him because justice department policy is you can't indict a sitting president. if that's the case, it's not that meaningful a reassurance. on the other hand, if it's meant to be they're going after people around the president but don't have any evidence the president, himself, has done anything wrong, that would be a different interpretation. of course, it doesn't stop congress.