name where judge kavanaugh at bottom said catholic church, you folks, you know, can deny contraceptive coverage to your employees because it is too much for you to have to file a two-page form. and interestingly she did not cite to a much more relevant case in which judge kavanaugh was the dissenter. it was the garza case wherein he said, bottom line, a 17-year-old girl who should have been able to have an abortion, he dissented from that right. that is a much more relevant case. and for any of us at this point to think that any of these nominees who come before us and say roe v. wade has set a law. they don't have to overturn roe v. wade, states like texas and louisiana are very busy adopting all kinds of laws that would limit a woman's right to choose. these laws will be challenged to the supreme court. i fully expect judge kavanaugh