acceptable is not to actually investigate the allegations which is what the chairman at this point is threatening to do. his terms includes you show up on monday or we are going to have al vote and we won't talk to any of the other possible witnesses. now, i can see a lot of room for arguments along the edges of what the appropriate process is. if you are interested in learning the truth, would involve voting without investigating or hearing from the two principles without hearing from anybody else who may know what happened or something about what happened. i say this hesitantly but i honestly can't see any signs of good faith here.