it. so he's trying to distance himself. it's just -- it is a total what we call false exculpatory, what he says about his knowledge. it looks false because it is. and so i think, again, if he had a lawyer advising him, it was not a good lawyer. >> and, jill, the idea that this is helpful to the president himself alone saying this is a way of saying that the president isn't guilty of anything, i still can't think of any reason to put that in a tweet, even if that's what the president believed, that she whe wasn't g of anything. >> he's not getting very good legal advice. and something she said also reminded me of why, for example, rosemary woods was never indicted for perjury. she testified she erased 18.5 minutes and described how she did it and the testimony showed that that did not happen. but we didn't indict her because