the criticism of the mueller view is they're trying to make manafort like he had fancy coats and fancy brands. legally, that's not the problem and unfair and all they have to prove is tax evasion. do you think the judge is hitting that right and fairly? >> i think he is, although he does bring it up a lot. i'd say roughly hour or two he makes a comment about manafort is not on trial for being rich or having a lavish lifestyle or extravagant tastes and prosecutors often agree with the judge but insist they need to show the value of these luxury goods that manafort was getting them to convince jurors his tax returns could not cover the lifestyle he was living in addition to proving this point of the very very strange payment arrangements. nearly every vendor that came up said they were paid by overseas wire transfers from shell