what he's doing has no impact on the decision at all. that is a very broad, broad reading of the powers that the president has to do whatever the heck he wants under the rubric of national security. look at the totality of the comments and the statements that can lead one to conclude that the real desire was for a muslim ban which should be unconstitutional as based on religion. >> in the argument you're making, the idea of he said this on the campaign trail. let's match this up with the action he tried to take as president and see if we can see clearly what the true motivation is. is there any kind of slippery slope potential in that sort of thing. on a different issue, not net y necessarily immigration. you try to match up what a presidential candidate says on