can reswview what the presidents did, they rubber stamp his actions despite the clear evidence. the court closes its eyes to all the statents the president made and the court parts ways with what every one else in the country and around the world knows based on president trump's statements that he enacted all tlee three versions of is ban in order to carry out his promise to ban muslims from coming into the country. >> i just try to understand here. the court is looking at this. if i'm understanding the argument here in the decision correctly. they are saying it's about 8% of the world's muslim pop yulation this applies to. it would look different from what he's saying. they're saying the underlying power being exercised and what makes this complicated is the underlying power to deny entry is a legitimate power that any president could claim and the debate becomes about is he