mayo dissented from the court's holding here. they've dodged the larger question. what he's talking about is that the oral argument there was a question from justice kennedy who wrote the opinion here about a comment made by a member of the colorado human rights mmison. co iofhose states thats have has that has hey human rights law and on that basis they said the baker has to bake the cake for the same-sex couple. what justice kennedy says is that comment by that member of the colorado human rights commission is evidence of hostility to his religious views. so for that reason, and that reason only, the baker gets a win here. but it doesn't say anything about the larger issue. and let me just read briefly from the conclusion of the opinion. >> great. >> reporter: he says. the outcome of cases like this in other circumstances has to wait for further elaboration in ourts and then here's the key part, all in the context of recognizing that these disputes