time that the lease was considered and that he was actually living there. he has not live there for quite awhile. he's no longer a tenant that have condo. so that is inexcusable to think there was not such a document that existed at the time that the lease was entered into that evaluated. to do it after the abc breaks the story undermines any suggestion that this was an arp's length kind of evaluation of the appropriateness of him being there and that the market rate. it looks like something they threw together in a day to try to defend what he had already done. >> the author of that is kevin minoli, a career person there 1 years. it was striking he you the his name to the memo. he owns that as a kind of independent career judgment about the ethical probity there and one wonders under what circumstances that was written. given the way that the arrangement obviously flies in the face of sort of common sense. you've also got a story, sam, in the daily beast that the pruitt lied to congress about using