he appears to be calling for jeff sessions i think to investigate his political opponents. what do you make of that? >> well, it's much the same as what we've seen from the president this the past. that is he thinks the justice department is his justice department to do his will, to investigate his opponents. he doesn't seem to understand that the justice department exists to serve the interests of the public and the interests of justice. it's not simply his personal law enforcement arm. but i'm glad the justice department i think understands their responsibility, even if the president doesn't. >> your memo came out over the weekend rebutting parts of the nunes memo, giving sort of a fuller sense of the context for it. and i found it fairly persuasive, already a lot of the facts had already been entered in evidence. given what mueller has done the last few week, does it render the whole thing kind of moot anyway? >> i think the gop memo largely discredited itself. but nonetheless, i think it's important that the american people see the actual facts that were presented to the fisa court and understand that that the fbi was acting appropriately. it had plenty of good reason to be concerned that carter page might be acting as an agent of a foreign power, in this case russia. it's also i think significant that our memo discloses first tim d e-m into and we now campaig papado e prepa di t c th f russ help in disse d but i and camp e-ma court in so w hilla t in and so unc investig t being pres soon. i can't spe hope to hav forthcomi if there have been other stev ins t wha and he wou d forthcomin prog d committee to focus on this attack on w has action aft c privilege in front of your c >> there has majority look, you said you were going to enforce them. you said you were going consider contempt if he didn't answer these questions. he didn't answer them. and you acknowledge that if we allowed no for an answer, we