honest, i was surprised as you were that they didn't provide it. what do they have to lose at this point. they don't look good already because of the situation that they have. >> and it's scary to be thinking about waiting on this thing to explode. putting aside the damage that may or may not occur because of a fire or explosion, what's your sense about how damaging it may be just to have this plant be so damaged by what's about to happen? how toxic is this stuff? what type of other facilities are around it? are we looking at something that's going to be an environmental, or sort of pollution crisis even after whatever happens with the initial fire or explosion? >> right. actually, just a bit more than two miles down the road from the arkema facility, there's another chemical plant called kmco, they're also on our high potential for harmless. that's all based off of analysis we did with texas a&m