order and just the text that was in there saying this is all neutral now so let's just go along this. there is no discriminatory intent there. the judge saw otherwise. we argued that there is supreme court case law that indicates that courts ought to look at the context behind the text in order to be able to find a discriminatory intent, particularly if the intention is to mask what is that discriminatory intent. so that's what was going on here. rudy giuliani's statement was one of them. >> the case here as i understand it going through the filings, it does hang on this question of intent, right? essentially is the intent so rotten, so sort of deeply unconstitutional in its desire to disfavor a single religious group in violation of the establishment clause that any iteration of it, no matter how it's dressed up, would be senate to that's the case you're making. >> right, exactly.