through him. him or her, i should say, not knowing the gender. so it's so explosive that one wonders why they would put it up there and include it in the classified version of this report. >> okay, so to that end, there's a subtext here, a broader context here, which is, a, that intelligence is a difficult business and often raw intelligence is later disproven or doesn't pan out. but there's also, of course, the context of the incoming president-elect, the president-elect and the intelligence agencies with whom he has essentially been waging public war. as basically denigrated them, said these are the same people that got iraq wrong, rejected in some senses outright although maybe reluctantly accepted. do you think that context is important here? >> i do think it's important and i think this must also be contributing to the tension between donald trump and the intelligence agencies. if they're giving time kind of