you to vote no for him? >> that's why i said i have not made a tifinal decision. the attorney general is the person who is his job is to make sure that there's not fraud but there's not voter suppression. and it clearly there's voter suppression in north carolina they started when the shelby case was decided which ending the preclearance. this is upsetting evidence. if the court said they targeted aechlt with surgical precision so they did not vote, and this was in effect for several years before the court rejected it and as a result there were tainted elections in north carolina. well can't have that. we cannot have the chief law