>> so there we have the jury foreman for the slager case. that will go to a new trial, but as we look at the graphic now, and i want to show everybody, eric, the roof jury. here we know we're hearing from the foreman in the slager case, you know, they tried to come to consensus, they couldn't do it. this is a different mix up or a different makeup, rather, of a jury, and they are basically deciding whether or not to take a man's life, a young man's life for a horrific crime that he confessed. what is the onus when it comes to a jury that has to go behind closed doors to come up with that verdict? >> you have to lk at several factors. you have to look at mitigating circumstances. what this young man's life was like. what things impacted him and brought him to this particular decision to kill nine people. you also have to look at the impact on the victims, their pain and suffering and other factors such as that, and it's very difficult for a jury to decide they're going to take a person's life because as a