which comes to about 400 million. the justices didn't seem to buy it today. they seem receptive to the argument samsung made that people buy smartphones for the cameras, the way the phone connects to the internet. those other functions. the supreme court has to decide what is this like? like wallpaper where the design is the whole thing? or a scarf? or is it a cup holder in a car. surely the justices seem to say and samsung argued if somebody rips off the cupholder design from a jeep you can't see gm owes the entire profits on the car for the stolen cupholder idea. what is the phone? is the design the whole thing or is it part of that. they are going to send this back to the lower court to say the jury has to decide how much sam zung owes. it seems sam sung will prevail and won't have to pay all the money it ever made on smartphone