dismissed it. but l.a. usd, on the other hand, sees just enough in here of local references, it really got their attention. >> it did, yet there are clearly parts of the e-mail that are false. the writer claims to be a devout muslim. i might use the term extremist muslim. but the from line on the e-mail which i won't disclose but it contains a pornographic reference to a body part. that's not something that either the extremist or devout muslims would tend to do. the word allah is not capitalized in one circumstance. there are other typos in the e-mail but this is a place where you would expect a devout muslim to be careful. and there's certainly nothing in the e-mail that indicates that the author has any understanding of islam, no references to the koran, no allusions to events in the life of mohammad.