if you think, for example, about the garland, texas, attack is immediately afterwards to be very specific about what they did, charts and graphs, circles and arrows, pictures of people involved and they haven't done that here so, you know, all of which is to say it's very suggestive. there are some things in intelligence that they're not telling us. we have a sense of what some of it is and we can't report it. but all of those things together, rachel, the physical stuff and the intelligence lead them in a direction but don't get them to the conclusion. >> clearly we have in terms of thinking about isis or a group like them, we obviously have motive. the question is whether they have means and i think that brings us pretty specifically to the question of whether or not we understand enough about the security of the airport from which this aircraft took off and any security concerns around this airline specifically. is sharm el sheikh considered to be a dangerous place in terms of