given them the opportunity to consider whether this is something to do with terrorism. but at the moment, there really is no objective evidence to that effect. so i think we need to be very, very careful here. there are other reasons that there could have been an explosive decompression. i don't know that those reasons are any less significant or cogent or credible than a terrorist plot. but given the history, the safety history of this particular airline and given the maintenance record of this aircraft, i think those are the reasons that seem more likely to me than terrorism. again, not knowing specifically what piece of intelligence provoked the u.s. or uk, but there's been no definitive statements whatsoever. and we need to be very careful about jumping to conclusions. let's not forget all the reporting that came out after the german airliner that crashed in southeastern france.