>> you could argue everybody's point of view is represented in the supreme court. isn't that a good thing? everybody has seen gets a piece of what they wanted representative and how they to want see the constitution interpreted. >> that's true. i appreciated professor ogletree's explanation of how this evolved through the years. i loved pete williams' explanation of scalia being a textualist and roberts being an institutionalist. those are important distinctions. but to follow up on one thing speaker gingrich said i lost my train of thought. >> no, no. that's all right. >> no, no, i'm sorry. i did just kind of space there. i'm still visualizing the white house bathed in rainbow colors and i'm having a slight flashback. >> i can't wait for the red, black and green to come. >> no, but i think the marriage