>> look, i think it's fair to revisit what's happened to me. i've been very open about it. all i'm saying here is don't hide. don't scrub a book from your website that is cruel and anti-gay. i think that's an important thing for people to know. now, look the publisher says on their website that there is no allegation here of illegality or anything unethical. so i think what we'll be left with is 100% innuendo. the three cases the "times" cited yesterday in their report mainstream media credible media have looked at those exhaustedly, "wall street journal" spent nine months going over this territory and they were looking for inpropriety and conflicts of interest and they concluded that had there was no evidence of such. so let's see what the book says when it comes out. i'd be happy to come back if i'm wrong about it and be happy to say that but i think this is a political put up job and i can smell it a mile away. >> i'm wondering what the issue is with the "post," the "times" and fox news getting the exclusivity rights to the book.