to argue that point, the verbal noncompliance and the confrontation with the shift commander is actually what resulted in this man being taken. i think had the incident not been escalated to the point that there was the disobeying of the lawful order and the disobeying of the verbal instruction given that this would have probably settled itself. however, this man chose to escalate. >> they said that because i ate, i had to sit down, and the ar does not state that because i ate, i had to sit down. >> i'm going to go ahead and let my evidence stand as presented in my argue being as a result of this man's actions, staff were called away from their normal duties to deal with this incident. >> the case is continued until the next day for administrative reasons. but this time, drake presents the issue it at the root of his not accepting an assigned seat. >> it's more of a obsessive-compulsive disorder rather than refusal to sit with people because of racial issues or anything like that. i just prefer to sit on the southeast corner facing northwest. >> and i believe that. i'm just curious, why hasn't this come up before? how long have you been at this