they don't find anyone guilty or innocent. their decisions don't tell us what happens. that is true when they indict or don't. a prominent example was the response to the rams game demonstration by the st. louis police department that said because the grand jury found no probable cause to indict wilson, than anyone putting hands up to cite brown's possible surrender was, quote, pushing a narrative that has been disproven. no. that is simply not what the ferguson grand jury did. grand juries don't disprove anything. they decide whether there's enough evidence to go to a tlil. here's another obvious rule many people are breaking. in a homicide investigation, the testimony of the potential suspect alone does not establish the facts. the suspect is under pressure to save his career or his life. his views are less credible than any independent testimony or evidence. and yet -- >> the lessons are really basic. don't rob a convenience store. don't fight a policeman when he stops you and tries to take your