state and federal defense of marriage act. now, last year, of course, the supreme court ruled doma unconstitutional. how can they justify that hypocrisy? >> as you know, ed, whenever you don't know what to say, you do one of two things. if you like what's going on, you say i don't want to be an activist judge, i don't want to have an activist court. then, of course, if you like what's going on or don't, you are a strict constructionist or an originalist. you know what what's interesting about this is they say fit's not in the constitution, this is scalia now, if it's not in the constitution, it doesn't make any sense. do you see anything in the constitution about the air force? i don't either. is the doma in the constitution in if you use that way of thinking nothing will be enforced. frankly with all ott problems the fractionalized gop is looking at right now, gay conversion therapy and this ad hoc, imagine toir lsd version