is being forced to provide an abortion. paul clement in his closing said the same thing. that's the impression you're left with, this is the slippery slope to think about. >> so, what does this mean for the next line of cases? one of the things if you take a step back here that i kind of have this sneaking suspicious, i don't want impute bad faith. let me say it does feel a little bit like you can't please these folks in this sense, right? in this case you have this for-profit corporation says we don't want to do this birth control mandate. coming up before the court, you're going to have the little sisters of poor who have an accommodation under the law where they have to sign a form so they don't have to provide this birth control coverage. they're saying signing the form, itself, violates their religious liberty. it does feel a little bit like people have a problem with the law, or they have a problem with birth control more than they have the sort of abstract principle beliefs. maybe i am interpreting them through bad faith. >> no, i mean, one of the