misunderstood it would not have given the right to anyone to say we don't welcome gay people in our restaurant or or floral shop. it wasn't meant to do that. that's why i think i know a lot of democrats, and i will admit me too, i'm glad that governor brewer vetoed the bill, because it was such a distraction. a lot of people would say the title is all's well that ends well, but i think there's more appropriate titles d. comedy of errors and much ado about nothing. >> i want to go back to the -- a black norrest being asked to bake a cake in the christian identity movement. under current law, they should simply refuse, the folks could sue them and there wouldn't be anything under the current law for them to prevail. this law they were trying to pass in arizona would simply, if you refused a gay and less wean