trial saying it's a very confusing to the jury. so why do we have something on the books like that? and how do we sit there and allow this jury who the judge says may be confused. he had already read it one time. make a decision when you have a young man that lost his life. >> well, that's exactly it, reverend. shame on the state of florida. the law is confusing in every criminal case to begin with. and all lawyers, whether they be prosecutors or defense attorneys are well aware of this. but when you hamstring the prosecution with this self-defense law that basically confuses the jurors even further, confusion leads to reasonable doubt. as a defense attorney, i'm going to use the law in representing my clients to the best of my ability. but the prosecution shouldn't be hamstrung. they already have a very high burden, which they should in a free society such as ours that they have to prove our case beyond a reasonable doubt, and