christie knew about this from the beginning and he can prove it. it turns out he is saying that there is evidence that christie knew about it from the beginning but it is not clear that he has that evidence. he is saying he does have evidence that contradicts some things that christie said about him. it is trying to pars this is an exercise. >> i think you said a mouthful. the participants are always parsing their words, whether it is the governor's office. whether it is wildstein. whether it is wildstein's lawyer. everybody is being careful about the language and they should be. they could be in court under sworn testimony. this could move in that direction. i don't think it has. i have read the letter four times. i think it is a devastating letter. >> what in particular would you say is devastating? >> about the eighth para graph said he just laid it all out.