in june. she puts herself forward as a fighter for women. does this hurt her credibility? >> no, not at all. i think these were mistakes of memory, not of intent, in fact, there were more inaccuracies in the article than her own stated narrative. the reason conservatives are making a lot of this, and i congratulate my counterpart for saying this is much to do about nothing, but in texas, this is the biggest thing anyone is talking about because wendy davis does have a compelling narrative and they need to knock it down. she is a legitimate threat to greg abbott and that is why they are attacking her, but wendy davis doesn't need her ex-husband, who was quoted in the article, by the way, or any other republican, the basic facts are this, she rose from virtually nothing. she was the first in her family to graduate from high school, for crying out loud. she was a teenaged mother in a trailer park. she rose out of that, got into harvard and now state senate. the article changes none of that. >> one of the other complaints